[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Irresponsible denial of genuine suffering 

Credit:  Blayney Chronicle | 11 October 2012 | ~~

The relentless litany by wind farm proponents that “there is no credible peer review evidence” of adverse health effects (AHE) misses the point entirely.

While such a conclusion is not supported by formal reviews of the evidence in Ontario, the real point is that there is a relative lack of research concerning AHE in spite of the industrial wind turbines (IWT) being deployed for over 20 years.

The response should not be denial of AHE but rather a call for research to investigate the world-wide reports of AHE.

In the absence of further research, the denial of genuine suffering experienced by people living in the environs of IWT is irresponsible.

Why don’t the members of the Royal Colleges in Australia ask themselves if any of their member physicians have ever evaluated a victim, done sleep studies, serum cortisol levels or brain MRI’s.

Better still the results of the foregoing tests should be repeated after victims have been in the environs of IWT and then contrasted with the findings after they have been away from wind turbines for two weeks.

In Ontario, Canada, significant changes have been found.

Furthermore, the Royal College of Physicians should seek evidence of
* IWT safety as determined by clinical or epidemiological studies
* Net reduction of greenhouse gases in any jurisdictions with resultant health benefits.

No “credible peer review studies” will be found that exonerates IWT unless something has been published in the last 24 hours.

The behaviour of proponents supporting interventions such as wind farms in the absence of evidence does more harm in the fight to reduce greenhouse gases than any climate change denial.

Professor Emeritus R Y McMurtry, Ontario, Canada

Source:  Blayney Chronicle | 11 October 2012 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky