[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Study: Farm values blown away by nearby turbines  

Credit:  By John Miner, The London Free Press | October 4, 2012 | www.stratfordbeaconherald.com ~~

Homeowners close to wind turbines can expect to see much of their property values blown away, a provocative study by a London property appraiser has found.

Sellers in the future could even find their properties are worth nothing, says the study by Ben Lansink of Lansink Appraisals and Consulting.

“If there is no buyer, there may be no value,” Lansink concluded.

Industrial wind turbines have become a huge sore point for many in Ontario, with about 1,200 of the often-unwanted behemoths now in operation now and with the province having signed deals that will more than double that number in the next couple of years.

Lansink, who’s been qualified as a real estate expert in court proceedings, analyzed properties in the Shelburne area, north of Orangeville, home to Ontario’s first major industrial wind farm – the 133-turbine Melancthon Wind Facility.

He found five homes that had been bought by the wind farm developer, Canadian Hydro Developments, a subsidiary of Calgary-based TransAlta, at fair market value.

Canadian Hydro later put those houses back on the market and they sold for an average loss of 38%.

One brought 58.5% less.

“The erection of a wind turbine creates apprehension in the general public, which makes property less desirable and thus diminishes the prices of neighbouring property,” Lansink said.

The implications extend beyond individual land owners, Lansink said in an interview.

Other taxpayers in a municipality with wind turbines can expect to see their taxes go up to make up for the dropping property assessment of the turbine area, he said.

“Municipalities are going to suffer big-time. They are going to lose their tax base,” Lansink said.

Then, there are the lawsuits.

Some property owners next to wind turbines have already started suing their neighbours, wind farm companies and the province for loss of value and inability to sell their property.

Lansink’s study contradicts the findings of a 2010 study widely touted by the wind turbine industry that looked at land values in Chatham-Kent, another hotbed for wind-farm development.

Prepared by London real estate appraisers George Canning and John Simmons, that study concluded wind turbines didn’t bring down property values.

Their study looked at sales of properties within sight of wind turbines and a control area.

In tracing the sale of individual properties, Lansink looked at residences.

He was stunned to find easements attached to the deeds by the wind-turbine developer that said the company agrees the operation of the wind turbines may affect the living environment of the buyer.

Problems noted on the deed included heat, sound, vibration, shadow, flickering of light and noise.

The buyer agreed they couldn’t take legal action against the wind farm for any of the problems.

“They’ve told the world, ‘yes there are problems and here are the problems.’ That was a startling find from an appraisers point of view,” Lansink said.

Just nine years ago, when Ontario’s Liberal government swept to power, the province had only 10 wind turbines.

The province – the government has heavily pushed wind power, taking away local control over where they can be built and offering huge premiums for the power generated – has since outstripped the rest of Canada in generating capacity from wind farms.

Many of the giant towers dwarf nearby buildings, standing – highrise-like – 80 to 100 metres in height.


Canadian Hydro Developers bought the following sites

at market value while developing industrial wind turbines

nearby, then sold them after the project was completed.

How resale values changed:

2,500 sq.-ft., 3-bedroom, Cape Cod-style house, 1.8 acres

— 816 m from 2 wind turbines

— BOUGHT: Nov. 2007 for $500,000

— SOLD: Dec. 2009 for $288,400

2-storey, 3-bedroom home, 10-acre site

— 200 m from turbine

BOUGHT: Jan. 2007 for $305,000

SOLD: Sold Aug. 2009 for $278,000

3-bedroom bungalow on 1 acre

— 330 m from turbine

— BOUGHT: Aug. 2007 for $302,670

— SOLD: April 2010 for $215,000

One-storey house, 2-car garage, two acres

— 370 m from turbine

— BOUGHT: June 2005 for $299,000

— SOLD: June 2012 for $250,000

Dwelling and quonset (large outbuilding), 100 acres

— 580 m from turbine

— BOUGHT: Oct. 2007 for $350,000

— SOLD: Nov. 2010 for $175,000



Jane Wilson, president of Wind Concerns Ontario, a group opposed to wind farm development, said

said earlier studies pegged the drop in property values at 18 to 37%. Lansink found drops of 23 to 58%.

“Mr. Lansink’s work is certainly in line with the research we are seeing,” she said.

Wind Concerns Ontario is worried for people who bought property and were counting on it to increase in value for their retirement.


Jutta Splettstoesser, president of Friends of Wind Ontario, a group backing wind farm development, said a number of studies on property values and wind turbines have indicated that, if there’s any change in values, it’s only temporary. In Europe, studies have found no negative effect of turbines on property values, she said.

“What I worry about is that with the property values it is almost initiated by the wind opponents coming in with signs and attention on possible negative effects of wind turbines. It is almost a created problem.”

Source:  By John Miner, The London Free Press | October 4, 2012 | www.stratfordbeaconherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.