[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Patrick Smith, Stonewall Hill Conservation Group, Presteigne, on development of Reeves Hill Windfarm  

Credit:  Hereford Times | 3rd October 2012 | www.herefordtimes.com ~~

Stonewall Hill Conservation Group’s legal challenge to Herefordshire Council ’s decision to proceed with the development of Reeves Hill Windfarm continues.

Our written application for judicial review was not accepted (as is often the case). On our solicitors’ advice we are going forward to the next stage – an oral hearing to decide if the application is accepted. Our fight on behalf of the vast majority of constituents on both sides of the border will continue whatever the outcome of this hearing.

The fight is not futile but is a fight for democracy against greed and convenience. I wonder how the population of other villages in Herefordshire would feel if they were not consulted about such an industrial development near them, especially if they live in a beautiful area that relied on tourism?

Let’s be absolutely clear: wind farms are not green and do not cut emissions – this is one of the most important messages we need to get across on wind power.

The industry, of course, simply looks at the output from a turbine, calculates what emissions would be involved generating the same output from gas or coal, and claims that as the emissions They totally ignore the conventional backup, usually gas, which wind power absolutely requires to manage intermittency.

Because the conventional backup is held on spinning reserve for instant access when the wind drops, and because the back-up itself runs intermittently to complement the vagaries of wind, it is run very inefficiently and the capital cost of wind plus back-up is up to 10 times the cost of gas alone.

Inefficient running means that the overall system emissions savings, wind plus gas, are somewhere between not-verymuch and zero. The primary driver behind the development of wind power and Brussels’ Renewables Directive is the obsession with reducing emissions. Yet wind fails in its primary purpose. It is all cost and little benefit. It is sheer green posturing and gesture politics, which is undermining British economic competitiveness.

While billions of pounds is wasted and countryside damaged, the alternative solutions are being drained of investment. As for the idea that corporate money from the big energy suppliers can be used to create community energy schemes is naive and ill informed.

When the energy suppliers lose their subsidy for wind farms they will disappear overnight leaving the tax paper, who funded the subsidies, to pay the cost of repair for the environmental damage they have caused.

PATRICK SMITH, Stonewall Hill Conservation Group, Mouse Manor, Offas Green, Norton, Presteigne.

Source:  Hereford Times | 3rd October 2012 | www.herefordtimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter