[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Reader says turbines devalue property  

Credit:  www.mitchelladvocate.com 10 September 2012 ~~

I wish to share with you information I have found regarding wind turbines and their effect on property values. When contacting Veresen Inc (St Columban’s proponents) with this concern they stated that they didn’t EXPECT any effect on my property value and proceeded to send me a study that was supposed to reassure me.

Upon further investigation the study merely dealt with farmland (it doesn’t take an expert to know that it has gone up everywhere in the last several years). It made no mention of rural residential property. 

I received a property appraisal by a licensed realtor in the area since I was cautioned that if I waited until after the project’s completion, value loss could not be attributed solely to the project itself.

The appraisal confirmed my suspicion that in fact my property would be de-valued. The report stated that: “Wind turbines and their infrastructure are considered to have questionable environmental and habitation elements that would effect value trending and marketability.”

Another quote from the report indicated: “This property is potentially subject to hydro transmission. This factor is considered to be a detriment in the marketing and value trending for the subject property.”

Who would you believe: a wind company that stands to gain financially or a licensed real estate appraiser? Our appraiser went on to explain that not only the “project area” for the wind farm will be affected (his prediction was 20-40% decrease in value-depending on how close to the project area you are) but that the whole municipality can be associated with the wind project in the mind of a potential “outside-the-municipality” buyer.

MLS now requires you to disclose how close to a wind project your property is, as well as disclosing anything that could have an environmental impact on the property. He stated that the high-powered line (buried or not) would have to be disclosed to a potential buyer. 

I informed Huron East council in a deputation of the appraisal’s findings. I was told that they may pursue a bylaw to protect property values against any business that could potentially lower a neighbouring property’s value (not specific to a wind farm). Council told me proof was needed that MPAC assessments were in fact dropping near wind farms before considering such a bylaw. 

I sent away for a list of property assessment reductions from MPAC for Wolfe Island Township (home to the province’s second largest wind farm). This list, provided through the Freedom of Information Act, clearly shows all the assessment reductions since that wind farm became operational in 2009.

The list shows 78 significant assessment reductions since 2008 totalling $3 million. The six largest reductions were over $100 000 each (one being as high as $143 000). All these properties are situated very close to the turbines themselves. This very clearly shows what can happen to property assessments when wind farms are erected around residential areas. What is to prevent this from happening to Huron East ratepayers (and the municipalities’ tax base)? 

Huron East now has in its possession this list from MPAC. I have been informed recently that they, as a council, may no longer be willing to pursue a bylaw to protect our property values. If you would like your equity protected by the municipality, please contact your councillor. Once the St Columban project is operational, it will be too late.

Source:  www.mitchelladvocate.com 10 September 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.