| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Irresponsible editorial
Credit: www.bcrnews.com 20 August 2012 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Recently, the Sauk Valley Media Editorial Board published a shining endorsement of the Green River Wind Farm in the Daily Gazette. I would like to set the record straight on some of their assumptions:
Myth 1: Construction of turbines creates local jobs in the short term.
Fact: Developers bring their own crews in for construction. Very few local workers will receive any benefit.
Myth 2: Turbine maintenance creates local jobs long term.
Fact: Whiteside is considering nine turbines—one technician maintains 10 turbines, which equals one long-term job. At Mainsteam’s maximum estimate of Phase 1 and Phase 2, there would be 290 turbines over three counties, so we would share approximately 29 jobs between the three counties.
Myth 3: The value of the turbines means property tax dollars to local governments, especially public school districts.
Fact: General state aid to local schools is reduced based on increases to property tax revenues and may take years to resume after turbines are decommissioned – just ask economics professor David Loomis of the ISU Renewables Program!
Myth 4: Rent paid on land with turbines provides property owners with additional income that can buy goods and services from local businesses.
Fact: Most landowners who have contracted to host turbines are absentee landowners from other communities or states – that money won’t be spent here.
Red Herring Propaganda: Imagine all the highways that never would have been built.
Fact: Wind farms cannot be compared to highways! The cost of highways and wind farms is shared by all, but only a select few actually benefit from turbines – most who are harmed will never benefit or receive compensation.
These are a few of the problems associated with wind turbines coming to our communities. It’s a shame SVM has been as irresponsible in their endorsement as our county zoning committee!
Amanda Norris
Sterling
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=27148 ]
