[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbines draw opposition  

Credit:  Tracy Childs, Special | www.simcoe.com 6 August 2012 ~~

STAYNER – On Thursday evening at the Stayner Community Centre, the WPD held its second and final information open house for the proposed Fairview Wind Farm project west of Stayner.

A caravan of opposed community members in cars and by tractor and wagon, arrived from Clearview Nurseries at 5:30 p.m. Opposition organizer and nursery owner Kevin Elwood led the group, some hoisting signs reading messages such as “Wind Blows Ill” and “Say No to Wind Turbines”, to the parking lot of the Community Centre for a heavily policed and intense protest rally.

A parade of influential community members and area MPPs such as Jim Wilson and Bruce/Grey’s Bill Walker took to the microphone relaying their support of the opposition movement.

To a crowd of approximately 300, at least half wearing florescent yellow T-shirts with the image of a slashed wind turbine, many areas of concern for the proposal of eight, 500-foot tall wind turbines were addressed. Included was the economic impact to Ontarians for wind farms that according to Nipissing MPP and energy specialist Vic Fedeli, raises our hydro costs and produces a surplus of energy that we can’t use.

“We pay the highest rates for wind. It creates a surplus of energy on the grid that we have to sell to Quebec and the States at a loss,” said Fedeli.

Health study expert and Huron/Bruce MPP Lisa Thompson addressed the issue of public safety. Thompson indicated that the recent peer review health study by Dr. Arlene King, stating that there was no link between wind turbines and health issues, was incomplete. The Federal government’s Health Canada study has yet to be completed, and it is Thompson’s belief that any development of wind farms should be halted pending the results in 2014.

“Exercise your voice because rural Ontario matters,” encouraged Thompson

On the heels of the WPD press conference earlier that day that addressed the safety concerns of Collingwood Regional Airport’s proximity to the project, there was much opposition to the claim by WPD’s aeronautical study that a distance of 3.1 kilometres was a safe distance for aircraft.

Inside the Community Centre, WPD Canada spokespersons manned individual information booths to address the myriad aspects of the proposed project. A comprehensive film outlining the process of wind turbine construction, operation and site development was available for viewing. In addition, WPD’s extensive planning documentation and assessments in the areas of natural heritage, water body, mitigation, health and safety, cultural heritage and archaeological resources, noise impact, aviation, property values, local economy and job opportunities were on display for review.

According to communications manager and WPD spokesperson Kevin Surette, hosting the second open house was a necessary part of the application process of which they are halfway through.

“We have completed all studies and will compile all public feedback which becomes part of the application,” said Surette.

The next step is to submit the Renewable Energy Approval (REA) application to the MOE. The application is then placed on Environmental Registry for a 30-day public review period. After a period of six months to review the application, the MOE posts a decision notice outlining the construction, operation, and decommissioning in consideration of the environment and local community. Following this is an appeals process headed by the Environmental Review Tribunal.

Source:  Tracy Childs, Special | www.simcoe.com 6 August 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.