[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Stearns reviewing FAA emails showing White House political pressure to approve Cape Wind project  

Credit:  Congressman Cliff Stearns | Contact: Paul Flusche 202-225-5744 stearns.house.gov 27 June 2012 ~~

WASHINGTON, JUNE 27, 2012 – “As with Solyndra and other projects, emails and other documents* show that for political reasons the White House pressured a federal agency to approve an energy project,” said Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. “In this case, personnel at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved the controversial Cape Wind project under White House pressure without giving adequate attention to the risk Cape Wind would pose to small aircraft operating in the area.”

An internal FAA email dated May 7, 2010, states, “Who is willing to go tell the White House that we are halting wind development because there might be wake turbulence or microclimate effects?” A PowerPoint presentation to Eastern Service Area Directors on May 3, 2010, included, “”It would be very difficult politically to refuse approval of this project.”

The records also outline specific safety and national security concerns with the project. An October 31, 2011 email reads: “I don’t think air traffic could keep a low flying search-only VFR [visual flight rules] from running into a wind turbine.” The documents reviewed by my office clearly show that the FAA’s own experts have determined that the Cape Wind’s 42 story, 24- square-mile wind plant would have an adverse effect on the 400,000 annual flights that traverse this airspace, but instead the FAA succumbed to political pressure and issued its third No Hazard Determination in 2010. In 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned the FAA ruling that Cape Wind presented no hazard to aircraft or local air traffic control. Because of the Federal Court order, the FAA must now again consider the very real aviation safety risks posed by Cape Wind’s 24-square-mile wind plant proposed for an area directly in the middle of a highly trafficked, low-altitude flight corridor in Nantucket Sound.

FAA Internal Documents ( 06/27/12 01:25 PM PST )

Source:  Congressman Cliff Stearns | Contact: Paul Flusche 202-225-5744 stearns.house.gov 27 June 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: