[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

More to the Shelburne Planning Board 

Credit:  Shelburne Falls & West County Independent, April 6, 2012 ~~

Thank you for your efforts to preserve and protect the irreplaceable beauty, the people and environment by seriously considering the need for a ban on industrial wind turbine development and for special permit requirements and commercial limitations for any private wind turbines.

We are residents of Charlemont whose quality of life has been damaged by the presence of a single turbine half the size of the industrial wind turbines proposed for Shelburne. Both by day and by night its knifelike blades, dizzying movement or flashing bright red light is an irritant the NEVER goes away.

In addition, 80 percent of the time it is not moving (I am keeping a written og), Sometimes it moves slowly when there is absolutely NO wind – using up electricity.

People came here from Nantucket to see the Berkshire East turbine because he same model is proposed for their seaside community, Despite repeated and specific questioning, they got NO straight answers on energy output vs. energy used to run the turbine from the wind industry people who gave them the tour of the turbine. In addition, on that day, which happened to have a good wind, hey discovered that the noise from 4,000 feet away of this small turbine was quite loud and irritating.

On March 31st, Nantucket rejected the proposed turbine; 62 percent of townspeople voted against it. Nantucket is new on the fast-growing list of towns hat have rejected industrial wind turbines.

For these reasons and more, we urge you to enact the new bylaw that will ban these toxic, unsightly and useless pieces of machinery that would industrialize and destroy all that is precious and desirable about your beautiful town.

Chuck Maier and
Ellen Landauer

Source:  Shelburne Falls & West County Independent, April 6, 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky