[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Panel unanimously passes bill to overhaul Land Use Regulation Commission 

Credit:  By Kevin Miller, BDN Staff, bangordailynews.com 22 March 2012 ~~

AUGUSTA, Maine – Members of a legislative committee on Thursday unanimously endorsed a bill to reform Maine’s Land Use Regulation Commission after lawmakers reached an accord to remove the most contentious aspect of the measure.

The bill, LD 1798, will replace the seven-member slate of commissioners nominated by the governor with a nine-member commission of which eight members will be county commissioners or their designees. All nine members still would have to be vetted by the Legislature, however.

Earlier this month, members of the Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry Committee had endorsed competing measures after deadlocking on the issue of whether counties should be able to withdraw from LURC if local officials were unhappy with the state’s oversight.

But the committee held onto the bill and, after lengthy behind-the-scenes negotiations, lawmakers agreed to drop the “opt out” option. The result was a 12-0 vote in support of the bill with one member absent.

Senate President Kevin Raye, R-Perry, called the unanimous vote an “important step forward in the effort to bring greater local control and accountability to land use planning in Maine’s Unorganized Territory.” Raye had been a vocal proponent of LURC reform, even sponsoring a bill last year to dismantle the agency and hand over most responsibilities to counties.

“I appreciate the willingness of stakeholders and legislators with diverse views, as well as the LePage administration, to do the hard work necessary to build consensus,” Raye said in a statement. “This result shows what can happen when people are willing to listen and respond to each other respectfully in order to bridge differences.”

LURC is responsible for permitting, zoning and planning on more than 10 million acres, or nearly half of the state of Maine. But the agency has long been accused by some landowners of stymieing economic development and putting too much emphasis on protecting natural areas. Those criticisms gave rise to a task force whose work formed the basis of LD 1798.

Under the proposed changes, county commissioners in each of the eight counties with the most land within the Unorganized Territory would nominate one member. Supporters claim that change will ensure localities have more say on decisions.

The bill also would:

• Transfer some minor permitting responsibilities to counties.

• Have the Maine Department of Environmental Protection handle all commercial wind power projects.

• Relocate some central office LURC staff out of Augusta to areas closer to the Unorganized Territory.

• Direct LURC to work with counties to develop regional planning and zoning.

Democratic committee members had been the most vocal in opposition to the opt-out clause, which they dismissed as a way to gradually weaken the agency. Supporters of the opt-out clause, however, said the stipulations counties would need to meet before withdrawing would be set so high that few if any would likely attempt it.

But several Republican lawmakers from counties with significant acreage in LURC territory had also opposed the withdrawal option. And in the end, it appeared that legislative leaders may have counted the votes.

The bill now heads to the full House and Senate for consideration. Because it may arrive with unanimous committee support, however, the bill could avoid floor debate.

Environment Maine, one of the groups heavily involved in the debate over LURC, said in a statement Thursday evening that they were “thrilled that the worst part was thrown out as a result of the public outcry.

“But we continue to have concerns about the makeup of the new Commission and the standards that will guide their decisions,” the group said. “We’re committed to closely watchdog the changes as they are implemented and to continue to fight to protect the North Woods for future generations.”

Source:  By Kevin Miller, BDN Staff, bangordailynews.com 22 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon