[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Push for green energy means bigger electric bills  

Credit:  By Susie Steimle, WCAX, www.wcax.com 22 March 2012 ~~

MONTPELIER, Vt. –

In a state where natural resources are celebrated, lawmakers are asking folks at home to harvest them and make them Vermont’s main source of power.

“The future for Vermont and Vermonters is we’ll be more independent as individuals, communities and as a state,” said Robert Dostis of Green Mountain Power.

The energy bill, which passed the House 91-46 this week, puts Vermont on the path to be 75 percent reliant on renewables by the year 2032. Green Mountain Power supports the state’s renewable energy efforts but disagrees with what it means for ratepayers.

“We’re looking at a 1.8 percent impact in the early years and 20 years out it could be as high as 7 percent,” Dostis said.

For the average household with an energy bill of $75, that would mean in 20 years they’d be paying an extra $63 a year. The state predicts rates will only increase by 4 percent, which would be an extra $36 a year. For families that could mean cutting a few corners, but for businesses that difference is in the millions.

“What that means for the future in terms of jobs, wages and investments is very worrying,” said William Driscoll of Associated Industries of Vermont.

Driscoll says he’s disappointed with the lack of analysis the state has to offer for the cost of this plan, which he thinks could make more businesses leave the state.

“We’re already at a disadvantage in terms of holding onto jobs and attracting new investments. So for businesses, even a small increase in electricity costs would be a big concern, especially if they’re energy intensive,” Driscoll said.

Supporters of the bill say testimony on the House floor went by without debate.

“In two days, three roll call votes, not one question,” said Rep. Tony Klein, D-East Montpelier.

Klein says this either means people don’t understand the bill or don’t have a problem with it. The bill now moves to the Senate.

An important portion of this bill is establishing a renewable portfolio standard; essentially requiring utilities to have a certain portion of their energy come from renewables by benchmarks outlined by the state.

Vermont has been developing renewable energy since 2005 with a program called SPEED, but Vermont sold rights to the renewable energy projects to other states. Part of the RPS will require those projects to be retired so Vermont can claim some of those renewables for itself.

Source:  By Susie Steimle, WCAX, www.wcax.com 22 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter