[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Woodstock voters to decide on fireworks  

Bob Elliot, speaking for the Wind Power Committee, asked for "one year of information so as to put together an ordinance for next year." The committee decided to observe the actual operations of the Spruce Mountain facility and gather public feedback in order to craft an ordinance specific to Woodstock. Elliot said they "have no intention of asking for another year." Selectmen said there are no current applications for further wind turbines in Woodstock.

Credit:  By Ken Briggs, Advertiser Democrat, www.advertiserdemocrat.com 15 March 2012 ~~

WOODSTOCK – About 20 voters turned out Tuesday evening for a public hearing on four proposed ordinances that will be on the Town Meeting warrant.

Voters will be asked to take action on measures banning the sale of consumer fireworks within town limits, adopting a quiet zone in Bryant Pond village, freezing the acceptance of any applications for wind turbine projects for one year and adopting a Certificate of Occupancy ordinance.

As of January 1, 2012 the state legalized possession, use and sale of “consumer fireworks,” as defined in the new law. Towns were given the option of restricting sales within their limits.

Speaking on behalf of the Woodstock Fire Department, Tom Hartford said “the town does not have the resources to police a fireworks store.” He noted that the age requirements, hours of use and types of fireworks allowed are “taken directly from the state statute.”

Hartford also reminded the audience that “some out of state purchases may not be legal here” as bottle rockets are not legal under the new law.

The ordinance also would give the town recourse to recover costs incurred for responding to fireworks-related personal injuries or property damage.

Bob Elliot, speaking for the Wind Power Committee, asked for “one year of information so as to put together an ordinance for next year.”

The committee decided to observe the actual operations of the Spruce Mountain facility and gather public feedback in order to craft an ordinance specific to Woodstock.

Elliot said they “have no intention of asking for another year.” Selectmen said there are no current applications for further wind turbines in Woodstock.

The most hotly-debated issue was the Certificate of Occupancy Ordinance. If it passes, the town would be able to require new home builders and business owners to sign off on a document saying they have met all town, county, state and federal requirements for their building.

As Woodstock has no building code, town requirements are limited to driveway and building permits, an approved/completed septic plan, electrical disconnect switch, a final plumbing inspection and a house number.

Selectman Rick Young opened the discussion by noting that the town has been asked by banks and insurance companies for such a certificate, and “we cannot issue one.”

Selectman Ronald Deegan said the ordinance “is a great footprint for you to follow. It is the responsibility of the owners to learn, and we will help.”

Developer Leon Poland said “the contractor ought to sign off” on the form as well.

It was agreed that voters will be asked only to decide whether to approve the ordinance as written, and that the actual certificate will evolve as needed.

The final discussion was on the proposed quiet zone. Jan Kendrick drafted the ordinance, based on one used in Mechanic Falls.

There was a lot of discussion on the use of noisy compression release engine brakes to slow down trucks coming into Bryant Pond. Kendrick said all she is “asking for is respect that this is a village.”

Most of the attendees wanted the selectmen to put up a sign at either end of the village on Route 26. As an ordinance is required before the Maine Department of Transportation will do so, the ordinance was rewritten so as to more narrowly address the issue.

Source:  By Ken Briggs, Advertiser Democrat, www.advertiserdemocrat.com 15 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter