[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Judge allows wind turbine lawsuit to proceed  

Credit:  By Peggy Aulisio, Editor, www.southcoasttoday.com 15 March 2012 ~~

FAIRHAVEN – Bristol County Superior Court Judge Thomas F. McGuire Jr. issued a ruling March 8 allowing a lawsuit by opponents of the wind turbines to move forward.

The attorneys for the developer had sought to have the case dismissed.

Judge McGuire allowed the two counts to proceed. One challenges the selectmen’s changing of the lots that were approved at the May 2007 Town Meeting. The other is based on alleged violations of the open meeting law.

Kenneth Pottel of Windwise said Tuesday night that he was very pleased with the judge’s decision. He referred specific comments about it to the group’s attorney, Ann DeNardis, who represents 10 plaintiffs.

On Tuesday, Ms. DeNardis said the judge’s decision means, “The developer goes forward with the construction of these wind turbines at his peril.”

Ms. DeNardis said the Feb. 15 Town Meeting vote to indefinitely postpone a vote on halting the turbines was not a vote of confidence in the project. She said the vote left an opening for opponents to make another attempt to close them down at a Town Meeting in the future.

Ms. DeNardis said selectmen exceeded their authority when they changed one of the lots without seeking Town Meeting authority. In e-mails to Executive Secretary Jeffrey W. Osuch, developer Gordon Deane expressed concerns about changing the lots without going back to Town Meeting.

Ms. DeNardis said selectmen are required by law to “comply with the directives of Town Meeting and they went beyond their authority.”

She said selectmen also violated the open meeting law by meeting in executive session and thus trying to keep the project low key. She said they were “in essence keeping the town in the dark” when they should have kept the residents informed.

Town Counsel Thomas Crotty did not return a phone call from The Advocate in time for the paper’s deadline. He told The Standard-Times that the case is unlikely to be heard until 2014.

Mr. Osuch said the turbine opponents were rebuffed earlier by the same judge when he refused to issue an injunction, which would have forced a halt to the turbines.

This time, developer Fairhaven Wind LLC’s attorneys tried to get the case thrown out; they lost out when the judge said it may proceed. The case now proceeds on the same two counts the judge allowed previously.

Meanwhile, the developer has been moving forward with the wind turbines.

Source:  By Peggy Aulisio, Editor, www.southcoasttoday.com 15 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.