[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bright idea could save plenty for Fairhaven  

Credit:  www.southcoasttoday.com 13 March 2012 ~~

Fairhaven has cleared an area to save electricity and lower energy usage with wind turbines at a minimum cost of $9 million and destruction of town forest land.

Here is an idea to save more money with no destruction, no humans hurt, no birds killed, for 5 percent of the cost.

The light bulb over our heads is the idea!

If you bought 20,000 compact fluorescent 100-watt lights bulbs, which use 23 watts, at a cost of $15 each for the townspeople and town buildings at a cost of $300,000.

This is $8.7 million less than a turbine, you would get a yearly savings of $200,000 (same as turbine) based on $.10 per kWh and four hours use per day.

That is an absolute drop in the use of electricity (really good for the environment). Using 20,000 bulbs times 77 watt savings times 4 hours day times 365 days equals 2,248 megawatt-hours, which is the same as an average wind turbine.

These don’t only work when the wind blows – they save electricity every night, 365 days of the year.

This is just one example of what money could buy in efficiency.

Imagine having another $8.7 million for other good ideas – talk about bang for the buck.

Also, no birds killed, no environment ruined, no bike path ruined, no people harmed with noise, no financial risk, no people in danger from falling industrial parts, no costly repairs, no ruining the legacy of Little Bay, no lawsuits!

Is the town of Fairhaven buying a turbine for the environment or just as a show piece?

Frank Haggerty


Source:  www.southcoasttoday.com 13 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.