[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Study: Northborough wind power presents problems  

Credit:  by Bret Matthew, The Daily Northborough, www.thedailynorthborough.com ~~

NORTHBOROUGH, Mass. – Wind power in Northborough is technically feasible, but may not be economically or ecologically viable without further study, according to a recent report.

Last spring, the town chose Sustainable Energy Developments (SED) to investigate the possibility of building wind turbines at Tougas Farm, Davidian Brothers Farm and Mount Pisgah. Using an $85,000 grant from the state’s Wind Incentive Program, the Ontario, New York-based company built a meteorological tower at Tougas Farm and used the data to estimate the effectiveness of six potential turbines within the area.

“Each had different issues,” Town Engineer Fred Litchfield said. “The wind isn’t quite as much as we hoped. SED recorded an average of 5.5 meter per second wind, about 12 miles per hour. A speed of at least 14 miles per hour would have been required to make most of the turbines worthwhile. In the study, low to moderate wind resource was labeled one of “the most significant limiting factors.

“That doesn’t mean it’s completely dead,” Litchfield added.

SED Project Manager Matt Vanderbrook said, “We were able to identify some sites where we could site a medium-level wind turbine.”

To improve project returns, the report’s conclusion suggests the possibility of building two wind turbines, allowing economics of scale to take effect.

The most effective potential turbine was a large-scale 1.8 megawatt turbine installed at Mount Pisgah, the highest point in Northborough. Though the costliest of all the turbines at over $6 million, it paid for itself in the shortest amount of time—9.6 years, compared to 14-16 for the others—and was projected to save the most money overall.

But such a turbine, Vanderbrook said, would create its own issues, due to access challenges and the fact that it would require construction on conservation land. This was also pointed out in the report.

Ultimately, said Litchfield, “It’s really a matter of what the public wants to do.”

The public will have the opportunity to give their input at the Wind Committee meeting on Jan. 11, 2012. A representative from SED will be present.

Source:  by Bret Matthew, The Daily Northborough, www.thedailynorthborough.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch