[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Town Meeting member urges local officials to carefully consider impacts of turbines  

Credit:  www.southcoasttoday.com 14 December 2011 ~~

Because of the controversy over safe setbacks and the resultant adverse health effects to residents from an improperly located wind turbine, a town selecting wind turbines as its alternative energy source faces a decision centering around profit for the town or protection for its residents.

For that reason, the town must be willing to work on a parallel track with its Board of Health, with the town focusing on project development and the health board, in an advisory capacity, researching and monitoring the project through all stages of development.

In this manner, the town will be required to give equal consideration to the human factor— that is, residents’ health and welfare, in its decision-making.

Town officials should be willing to conduct on-site visits to communities with turbines comparable to those contemplated for their own town, and to experience first-hand, even if only for a short time, what living with a turbine as a neighbor is like. By doing so, they will have afforded themselves a better opportunity with which to evaluate their personal reactions against what is told them by those in the wind power industry who have a stake in turbine sales and construction.

Comparison should be equal, with turbines and location as similar as possible; if a larger turbine is compared to a smaller turbine or the locations greatly differ, both officials and the public will be misinformed and misled, which could give rise to a false sense of security easily misconstrued by both.

Officials should also be willing to take the time to talk to residents, such as those in Falmouth, who live in close proximity to a turbine. Face-to-face meetings would provide personal interaction that paperwork could never provide, allowing officials a different perspective with which to assess if turbines were a judicious avenue to pursue in their own community.

Essentially, town officials must ask themselves if the turbine project is a responsible undertaking in which everyone wins, and no one sacrifices.

Whatever the decision, it should be justifiable and officials should be prepared to do exactly that because residents should know precisely the basis of their decision. Residents should ask for those answers. If due diligence had been expended in the manner above, officials, as a matter of transparency, should have no difficulty answering.

Beverly Days


Source:  www.southcoasttoday.com 14 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.