[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Chilly reception to wind plan 

Credit:  By Jennifer Schleic, The Sun Times, www.owensoundsuntimes.com 9 December 2011 ~~

Proponents of the Samsung-Pattern Armow Wind Power Project got a mostly chilly reception from the public and some municipal councillors at a meeting in Kincardine Wednesday night.

Jody Law, project developer for Pattern Energy, insisted the company has every intention of working with the community on a compromise on the municipality’s wind generation system development policy.

“What’s it going to take to get you to leave?” demanded Coun. Jacqueline Faubert to a round of applause. Her speech was interrupted by Mayor Larry Kraemer, who called on council to maintain a polite air during session.

The proposed wind farm is 15-30% less dense than surrounding projects, according to Law, and the partnership is aiming for 90 turbines. However, if Samsung-Pattern Armow adheres to the setbacks outlined in the municipality’s policy, there will only be enough space for five.

“Your policy would see a 95% deterioration in usable land where we can site turbines,” said Law. “The project could bring $36 million in benefits to the community over the life of the turbines, but with municipal setbacks, that benefit becomes $2 million with only five turbines.”

Deputy-mayor Anne Eadie told Law that council’s original intention with the setbacks was to push turbines to the back of properties in order to distance them from homes and make it more convenient for farmers. However, Law showed council that woodlots make the policy impractical.

“I understand. The problem is woodlots, which are at the backs of most properties,” he said. “We don’t want to be cutting down trees and disturbing natural habitats.”

Coun. Randy Roppel suggested Samsung-Pattern move ahead with the five turbines the municipal policy allows for, and build from there with community compromise. Law said their plan is to aim for a base number of 90 turbines.

Law told council that Samsung-Pattern believes it is developing responsibly by meeting Ontario’s renewable energy approval (REA) regulations laid down in the Green Energy Act (GEA), which are some of the most stringent the company has ever faced.

“We want to work with the planning department to find solutions, because you saw the impact it has on the project,” he said. “For instance, would it be possible to compromise by, say, moving 50 metres inside the 800 metre setback to bring a turbine out of a woodlot?”

Law did commit to recognize the airport setbacks outlined in the municipality’s policy.

“We absolutely plan to adhere to airport setbacks. There is a big southwest corner of the project where we don’t have any turbines planned within that setback,” he added.

Law expected opposition from the community, but he was surprised by council’s position.

“We expected the sentiment up here. We knew and were aware of the issues with other developments,” he said. “I didn’t expect council’s reaction or the policy to be so specific because Ontario’s regulations are already so stringent. We’ve never seen an area so difficult to build in before.”

Samsung-Pattern will be opening a local project office, hold a series of open houses and public meetings and will continue to talk to council. Law also suggested there may be an opportunity to develop a working group of residents, council, municipal staff and Samsung-Pattern staff in the coming months.

The first open house will be held on Tuesday, Dec. 13 from 4 to 8 p.m. at the Best Western Plus Governor’s Inn.

Source:  By Jennifer Schleic, The Sun Times, www.owensoundsuntimes.com 9 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky