[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Province still controls the wind 

Credit:  The Chatham Daily News, www.chathamdailynews.ca 4 December 2011 ~~

Given the land impacts and often controversial nature, Chatham-Kent councillors would like to see more municipal control over wind turbine projects.

However, after the recent defeat of a private member’s bill, it is uncertain exactly when that would happen.

The Local Municipality Democracy Act, introduced by Prince Edward-Hastings Progressive Conservative MPP Todd Smith, was rejected during second reading Friday in a 45-32 vote, with the Liberal government and New Democrat members voting against it.

Chatham Coun. Anne Gilbert believes municipalities should have more authority concerning green energy, such as project location and when to say enough is enough.

Gilbert said wind power is still a divisive issue, with many in the agricultural sector supporting it, but also numerous residents opposed.

“As I travel the province, the people who are the most vocal manage to escape wind turbines,” she said. “Of course we opened the doors and said ‘welcome’. So, I suspect we are fair game for the province to establish as many as they want.”

The Green Energy Act was introduced in 2009. At that time, council expressed concern over losing its control over planning applications.

South Kent Coun. Art Stirling said the municipality was striking a responsible balance beforehand between the business merits and residential concerns.

“It’s aggravating,” he said. “I think it’s a lot better when the local community has control over its own destiny.”

He said his constituents have been quiet for the most part as of late – noting that for many, wind energy is a non-issue – but said there is a second wave of projects proposed.

“We want to be open for business, but we don’t want to be taken advantage of at the same time,” he said. “With the regulations the way they are now, there certainly is an opportunity for that to occur.”

Even if municipalities somehow wrestled back control, Stirling said he’s concerned the projects will already be built.

Gilbert said although Chatham-Kent has become a haven for wind power, it hasn’t experienced the positive economic spinoffs seen in other communities, such as new factories for turbine components.

“We have the turbines. We don’t have the jobs,” she said. “I think that says it all.”

Chatham-Kent Essex PC MPP Rick Nicholls said in a media release he was disappointed in the outcome of Friday’s vote.

“We must return decision making power to local municipalities who are in the best position to determine if and where green energy installations should be located within their communities,” he said.

However, Ontario Energy Minister Chris Bentley has maintained that a provincewide approach is the only way to make sure the process continues.

A patchwork approach of municipal regulations subject to frequent change amounts to “no rules at all” and would discourage investment in the industry, he said.

Bentley pledged to remain open to listening to municipal concerns – and has already heard of some – but made it clear the government will remain in control of the process.

“I’m very interested in strengthening the (system) as long as we have a provincewide approach,” he said.

– With QMI Agency files

Source:  The Chatham Daily News, www.chathamdailynews.ca 4 December 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky