[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

CAW should be ashamed  

Credit:  Shoreline Beacon, www.shorelinebeacon.com 22 November 2011 ~~

We own a cottage across from the CAW facility in Gobles Grove and discovered today (Nov. 10) that they plans to build 250-foot-tall wind turbine. In the past we have always been impressed with what good neighbours the CAW and its guests have been over the years. That opinion was set on its head today when we discovered – through the grapevine – that they will be building this eyesore.

As nearly as we can tell, the CAW has been planning to building a wind turbine since at least 2007. Their own newsletter, Contact, spoke with some pride in the May 11, 2007 issue (vol. 37, no. 18, www.caw.ca/en/3712.htm) about how they circumvented Saugeen Shore’s duly elected government and appealed to the largely unaccountable Ontario Municipal Board to get their way.

Is the CAW actually proud of using this tactic? This is how property developers in pursuit of their own selfish ends tend to behave. The council of the Town of Saugeen Shores was democratically elected by its citizens. Is their wisdom – the wisdom of the common man – not good enough for the Canadian Auto Workers? The CAW represents the common man until it no longer suits their purposes.

Their own Statement of Principles says the CAW is: “a union which reflects the goals of its membership, allows the members full participation”. The goals of the Town of Saugeen Shores and thus its citizens were to prevent the construction of this wind turbine. The goals of their fellow citizens are clearly not consonant with the goals of the CAW.

To be very blunt, the CAW wanted a wind turbine and the democratically elected, representative government of Saugeen Shores turned them down. So they went crying to mommy to get their way (and were actually proud of that fact!). Putting aside the aesthetic and health issues of their wind turbine, this is just not the way for Canada’s largest private-sector union to behave.

Tom and Liz Motz


Source:  Shoreline Beacon, www.shorelinebeacon.com 22 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.