[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Protection for neighbors of wind farms?  

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 18 November 2011 ~~

DIXON – Lee County homeowners near new wind farms may get protection if they suffer losses when they sell their homes.

By a 4-1 vote, the Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday approved a home seller protection program.

The proposal goes to the Lee County Board as part of a number of revisions to the county’s wind energy ordinance.

The County Board likely won’t consider the changes until early next year.

The home seller program would apply to property owners within 1 mile of turbines. And the protection would last 10 years after wind turbines’ building permits are issued.

The proposal details a complex appraisal process, in which the homeowner and the wind energy company each choose a licensed appraiser. In the end, if appraisers find that a home sold for less because it was near turbines, the wind energy company would pay the difference.

At Zoning Board meetings, participants have debated whether wind farms cause nearby property values to drop. The wind industry says there is no evidence that turbines hurt property values; its opponents take the opposite view.

As part of the proposal, the board included a requirement for a good neighbor program for homeowners within a mile. The companies must come to an agreement with neighbors about regular payments.

In other words, residents could get regular payments and home seller protection.

John Martin of Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power asked the board to include an opt-out provision for the home seller program.

He said his company would be able to offer more to homeowners under the good neighbor program if they could waive the home seller protection. Under the good neighbor policy, he said, there is more financial certainty for wind energy companies.

Mainstream has had experience with good neighbor policies, but not home seller protection programs, Martin said. The company is planning a wind farm for Lee, Whiteside and Bureau counties.

Franklin Grove Village President Bob Logan, who often has been at odds with wind energy companies, agreed with the opt-out provision. He also thought 10 years was a good limit for the home seller program. Others argued against a limit.

“It seems like you’re saying, ‘If you’re going to get out, get out in 10 years,’” Franklin Grove resident Steve Robery said. “I don’t understand the limit.”

Some disputed limiting the home seller and good neighbor programs to those within a mile, citing studies that say turbines can affect people up to 2 miles away.

“I think 1 mile is irresponsible,” Franklin Grove resident Mark Wagner said.

Zoning Board member Tom Fassler agreed. As a result, he was the only member to vote against the home seller and good neighbor proposal. Voting for it were Ron Conderman, Craig Buhrow, Glen Bothe and Mike Pratt.

Also Thursday, the board discussed the requirements for what to do with abandoned wind farms. Officials don’t want the county to be littered with unused turbines.

The meeting’s participants, including Mainstream’s representatives, agreed that some type of decommissioning plan was needed and that money needed to be in place at some point for such a process.

The board took no action on decommissioning, but may do so at its next meeting, which is Dec. 1.

The board has been meeting twice a month since the summer considering changes to the county’s ordinance.

To attend

The Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals meets at 7 p.m. Dec. 1 in the County Board meeting room on the third floor of the Old County Courthouse, 112 E. Second St., Dixon.

Go to www.countyoflee.org or call 815-288-3643 for more information.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI, www.saukvalley.com 18 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.