[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

State bears onus in wind fiasco  

Credit:  By ERIC TURKINGTON, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 18 November 2011 ~~

In ordering the shutdown of Wind 1, the infamous Falmouth wind turbine whose impact on the health of some neighboring residents has provoked a roiling controversy since it was installed, the Falmouth Board of Selectmen shut down more than just one wind turbine. It has shut down the Patrick administration’s ambitious goal of erecting hundreds of similar turbines in the towns along the coast and the hilltops of the commonwealth.

What other community will now follow in Falmouth’s footsteps, knowing where Falmouth has ended up?

The administration has offered every possible inducement to our communities to host these wind developments. They offered low-cost electricity to the towns, and a guaranteed subsidized price for the electricity delivered to the grid. They offered loans, and grants, and renewable energy credits. They offered huge federal and state tax credits, covering well more than half the developers’ costs.

They pushed for legislation to take away the powers of local boards to reject these projects. They watered down the state’s Wetlands Protection Act to clear the way for wind projects.

Using millions of dollars of “renewable energy” and “energy conservation” surcharges paid by the state’s electric customers on their monthly bills, they created a flourishing new line of work for energy consultants, preparing feasibility studies and noise studies and environmental impact statements.

Almost invariably these studies conclude that wind turbines would provide our towns with welcome revenue streams and no adverse impact – and be good for the planet as well.

Despite all these incentives, the administration’s efforts have not met with much success. On Cape Cod alone, wind turbine developments have been rejected in Orleans, Eastham, Wellfleet, Harwich, Brewster, and, most recently, Bourne.

Falmouth is the only town on Cape Cod that fell for the administration’s sales pitch and actually erected such turbines. The administration used Falmouth as the poster child for its plan to erect wind turbines all across the state.

Now Falmouth is shutting its turbine down, at least temporarily. (The Wind 2 turbine is not yet operational.) The town has become the poster child for a very different cause.

This change in course will be expensive. At the second night of Falmouth Town Meeting Nov. 8, where the turbine shutdown debate took place, the cost of repaying the grants and loans for the two town turbines was cited as $10 million. Another $1 million had been borrowed from the state to cover startup and operating costs that would also require repayment.

These are not costs that the town of Falmouth should bear. Along with the afflicted neighbors, the town, too, is an injured party here.

The town is the innocent purchaser of two industrial-size wind turbines that had been rejected by another Cape town. When Wind 1 was erected within a quarter-mile of a local neighborhood, it quickly became clear that neighboring residents’ health and well-being were being adversely affected.

The town was sold a bill of goods; industrial-size wind turbines cannot be safely located that close to residential areas. The state consultant’s representation that such a location would be appropriate, and would have no impact on the neighbors, was clearly wrong.

Once that became clear – and it certainly has by now – at that point the responsibility to fix the situation became the state’s, not the town’s.

The town of Falmouth has recognized it made a mistake, and is taking steps to correct it. The state should, too.

Eric Turkington practices law in Falmouth. He represented Falmouth and the Islands in the state House of Representatives from 1989 to 2009.

Source:  By ERIC TURKINGTON, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 18 November 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.