[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Hamilton tilting at windmills with ban  

Credit:  Emma Reilly, www.thespec.com 10 October 2011 ~~

Hamilton’s city council wants to ban wind turbines from being built inside its city limits.

Glanbrook Councillor Brenda Johnson introduced a motion at the last city council meeting asking the province for a moratorium on wind turbines in Hamilton until further studies are completed.

Johnson – whose motion came at the height of the provincial election campaign – says it’s not clear what effects the towers have on things ranging from human health to bee population, and thinks the province should look more closely at these issues.

But environmental groups say that sends the wrong message. If Hamilton wants to reinvigorate its sagging manufacturing sector and attract green businesses, it should promote the creation of wind turbines – not block it.

Councillor Brian McHattie says the motion could also have political implications at the provincial level now that Premier Dalton McGuinty – the man behind the Green Energy Act – has a minority government.

Johnson’s motion first asked for a province-wide moratorium on industrial wind turbines. However, after pushback from her council colleagues, Johnson dropped the request for an all-out provincial ban on wind turbines and instead asked for a comprehensive health study and a ban on the turbines in Hamilton alone. It passed unanimously.

Johnson – who worked for Environment Hamilton before becoming a city councillor – says she was torn between her environmental background, the potential revenue the turbines can bring into the agricultural sector, and the concerns coming from her constituents.

However, after speaking with farmers in her area – who were also opposed to the turbines – Johnson pushed ahead with her motion.

“The bottom line is I was hired to be the voice for Ward 11’s residents,” Johnson said.

Johnson points out that 70 other Ontario municipalities have asked the province for a moratorium on wind turbines. She also says the Green Energy Act, introduced by the McGuinty Liberals, does not give cities any say whatsoever in where the turbines are built.

“We’re just so focused on getting things done and going it bigger and better that we haven’t stepped back and said, ‘Let’s take a look at this and make sure it’s the right thing to do,’” she said.

As soon as studies prove turbines are safe, Johnson said, “I’ll be the first one to jump on the bus and say ‘let’s go.’”

Councillor Brian McHattie, who often allies with Johnson on environmental issues around the council table, said he thought Johnson’s motion was “a bit of a jab at McGuinty and his green energy act.”

McHattie points out that PC leader Tim Hudak is also wary of wind turbines and Glanbrook is part of his provincial riding.

“Perhaps it has repercussions that way,” he said.

McHattie said he didn’t expect Johnson’s motion to ask for a moratorium across the province – especially given her history at Environment Hamilton.

“I was a little surprised that she wanted Ontario wide, certainly,” he said. “But when you become a city councillor, you need to represent your constituents as well as your core beliefs, and sometimes the two become cloudy.”

Bill Thompson, the Hamilton spokesperson for the environmental group Blue Green Canada, said Johnson’s motion appears to contradict another resolution council passed earlier this year to continue promoting a green economy.

“It’s sort of puzzling to me,” he said.

He also points out that both Ontario and Hamilton’s medical officers of health say there are no proven health risks associated with the turbines. Passing this motion may send a negative message to green businesses who have the potential to reinvigorate Hamilton’s manufacturing landscape.

“I’d be worried that it would send that (message). It’s like we decide we want to build electric automobiles but we don’t want them driving in the city,” he said.

“It’s peculiar that a small NIMBY group has this kind of influence over city council.”

Source:  Emma Reilly, www.thespec.com 10 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.