[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Developers seek to weaken wind farm conditions 

Credit:  Tablelands Wind Turbine Action, 7 October 2011 ~~

Wind farm developers are contesting the conditions imposed by the Tablelands Regional Council at the High Road Wind Farm near Tumoulin on the Atherton Tablelands.

Residents are dismayed to learn the developers – also linked to the 70-turbine Mount Emerald proposal at Walkamin – want to reduce the conditions which protect neighbouring land owners from the impacts of the wind farm.

The Tablelands Regional Council approved the proposal on 9 June 2011 with a number of conditions, but the wind farm developers contested the conditions in a submission to Council on 7 July 2011.

The High Roads site was originally proposed by Transfield Services which has since been bought by the Thai corporation Ratchaburi Holdings, trading as RATCH-Australia.

Tablelands Wind Turbine Action spokesperson Steve Lavis said he was appalled by the developer‟s lack of consideration for their neighbours.

“The contested conditions mostly refer to the noise limits stipulated by the Council,” Mr Lavis said. “For instance, the developers want to delete references to „open windows‟ when testing noise levels in people‟s homes.

“This may come as a surprise to the developers, but most people in Far North Queensland leave their windows open, and in fact many leave their houses open or sleep on their verandahs in summer.”

Mr Lavis said other contested conditions suggest the developer wanted to avoid the controlling, turning off or decommissioning of turbines if noise levels were too high.

“They want the wording changed from „will‟ to „may‟. I think that says it all,” Mr Lavis said.

“The developers also want to reduce their responsibilities to ensure acceptable noise limits are met on neighbouring land which had already been subdivided prior the wind farm approval, but not yet built on.

“This raises serious questions for the potential impacts on more than 20 households which are located within 2km of the proposed Mt Emerald Wind Farm.

“We would like assurances from the Council that wind farms won‟t have any impact on the rights of neighbouring land owners to subdivide their lands in the future.

“If this is not the case, the Council is removing the rights and future benefits from these landowners.”


More information: Steve Lavis 0418 299 900

Source:  Tablelands Wind Turbine Action, 7 October 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon