[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine application rejected  

Credit:  The Fraserburgh Herald, www.fraserburghherald.co.uk 29 August 2011 ~~

A proposed wind turbine at Inverallochy has been rejected by the Banff and Buchan area committee.

Concerns were raised that the structure could have an ‘adverse impact’ on Inverallochy Castle which is a category B-listed property.

The 260ft turbine was planned for Hallmoss Farm and officials were worried that when viewed with a similar project at nearby Gowanfold, the character of the area would be changed dramaticially.

In a committee meeting report last Tuesday, it had been recommended that the Hallmoss proposal be rejected.

A report previously presented to the committee last month stated: “The development by virtue of its scale and location within the undeveloped coastal designation would detract from the unique open landscape quality of this location.

“The impact of the proposal when viewed in conjuction with the neighbouring wind turbine proposal at Gowanfold in event that both developments were to proceed, would detrimentally change the visual character of this sensitive landscape area by virtue of the unbalance and irregular layout of the proposed turbines.

Councillor Michael Watt who put forward the motion of the refusal at Hallmoss Farm said the application was too close to residential property.

“I am 100% behind green energy and have supported similar applications,” he said.

“The main problem with this application was it was too close to the residential area.

“The applicant only stays 12 miles away from the proposed site and was would bang in the middle of a proposed residential area.”

The area commitee unanimously rejected the application.

Source:  The Fraserburgh Herald, www.fraserburghherald.co.uk 29 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.