LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine application rejected 

Credit:  The Fraserburgh Herald, www.fraserburghherald.co.uk 29 August 2011 ~~

A proposed wind turbine at Inverallochy has been rejected by the Banff and Buchan area committee.

Concerns were raised that the structure could have an ‘adverse impact’ on Inverallochy Castle which is a category B-listed property.

The 260ft turbine was planned for Hallmoss Farm and officials were worried that when viewed with a similar project at nearby Gowanfold, the character of the area would be changed dramaticially.

In a committee meeting report last Tuesday, it had been recommended that the Hallmoss proposal be rejected.

A report previously presented to the committee last month stated: “The development by virtue of its scale and location within the undeveloped coastal designation would detract from the unique open landscape quality of this location.

“The impact of the proposal when viewed in conjuction with the neighbouring wind turbine proposal at Gowanfold in event that both developments were to proceed, would detrimentally change the visual character of this sensitive landscape area by virtue of the unbalance and irregular layout of the proposed turbines.

Councillor Michael Watt who put forward the motion of the refusal at Hallmoss Farm said the application was too close to residential property.

“I am 100% behind green energy and have supported similar applications,” he said.

“The main problem with this application was it was too close to the residential area.

“The applicant only stays 12 miles away from the proposed site and was would bang in the middle of a proposed residential area.”

The area commitee unanimously rejected the application.

Source:  The Fraserburgh Herald, www.fraserburghherald.co.uk 29 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky