[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind turbine issue picks up  

Credit:  Michael Gennings, Staff, www.simcoe.com 29 June 2011 ~~

STAYNER – The Township of Clearview says the province and Ontario Power Authority should consider WPD Canada’s revised wind turbine project, located just west of Stayner, a new project and not an amendment to the original application.

“The new WPD proposal substantially alters the location of the proposed wind farm project, increasing and shifting the study area significantly and altering the potential impacts of the proposal,” Mayor Ken Ferguson writes in a letter to Ontario Energy Minister Brad Duguid and Ontario Power Authority CEO Colin Anderson. “The proposal is not a minor amendment within the original study area. This submission is essentially an announcement of an entire new project affecting a different and larger area and should accordingly be processed as a new project rather than an amended project.”

Council OK’d the mayor’s letter to Duguid and Anderson at its meeting Monday night.

“The current project is not consistent with the project location described in the original Notice of Proposal to Engage in a Renewable Energy project and therefore does not satisfy the regulatory requirements with respect to proper notice of the project description and potentially impacted lands,” Ferguson told Duguid and Anderson. “The current project location is also inconsistent with the contents of the original FIT application, which require that the application provide legal and GPS descriptions of the project’s location.”

But WPD takes a different view than the township.

“Before we actually went public with this particular layout we did check with all authorities…and we were told everything would be fine,” WPD president Ian MacRae told The Sun on Tuesday morning.

WPD announced in early June, as reported in The Sun, it had relocated the eight turbines it proposes to erect.

“Some residents complained the turbines were too close to so-called accessory structures that received building permits from Clearview Township on the same day that the previous layout was publicized,” MacRae said when the changes were announced nearly a month ago. “Although regulations specify that the accessory structures need not be considered, WPD has found a way to alleviate these concerns and accommodate these structures. The solution was achieved with the complete cooperation of participating landowner families, as they too approved of changes to ease neighbours’ concerns.”

In the original mapping, the eight turbines were located south of County Road 91. The new plan shows that four of the turbines would be situated north of the county road and that the other four would be on the south side of the road. The change has also resulted in some of the turbines being located closer to the county road.

Michael Dickinson, who lives just south of the proposed site, is not happy with the new locations.

“In fact the relocation of six of the eight, 500-foot high industrial wind turbines closer to County Road 91 will negatively impact an additional 30 families who all will be living within 1,000 metres of these giants,” he writes in a guest column in today’s Stayner Sun.

Dickinson, a member of the anti industrial wind turbine group Preserve Clearview Inc., says there are other issues to consider.

“The new turbine locations will also be perilously close to the Collingwood Airport, endangering the lives of pilots and the public as well as curtailing expansion plans,” he said.

The Collingwood Regional Airport Services Board shares Dickinson’s concerns, as does the township. Clearview council passed a resolution last night calling for a “full and comprehensive review regarding any significant adverse affects the development will have on the safety and regional economic viability of the Collingwood Regional Airport.”

Preserve Clearview Inc., Dickinson says, continues, “to be shocked at the scale of this development on prime agricultural lands, in a prime recreational area of Ontario and the negative economic impact it is going to have on the Clearview community.

He said that property values will “plummet, seriously affecting retirement plans, and result in declining tax revenues,” if the project is allowed to go ahead.

WPD is hosting a public open house on Wednesday, July 13 at the Stayner Community Centre on Regina Street. The meeting runs from 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m.

If the province signs off on the project – dubbed the Fairview Wind Project – the WPD turbines will generate electricity that can be sold to Hydro One.

Source:  Michael Gennings, Staff, www.simcoe.com 29 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter