[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Top court rejects wind turbine challenge 

Credit:  John Spears, Business Reporter, www.thestar.com 21 June 2011 ~~

Ontario’s highest court has shut down an attempt by a wind turbine opponent to challenge the rule dictating how close turbines can be placed to dwellings.

Court of Appeal rejected on Tuesday the application by Ian Hanna for leave to appeal a lower court ruling, which said that the current regulation is valid.

That rule says that large wind turbines can be placed no closer than 550 metres from a dwelling.

Hanna’s lawyer Eric Gillespie had argued that the regulation wasn’t based on sound scientific evidence. He told the lower court that some people living close to turbines suffered an array of disabling health problems including sleeplessness, headaches and ringing in their ears.

Gillespie wanted the 550-metre rule set aside, and no further wind development allowed until a new setback rule based on better evidence could be adopted.

The lower court had rejected that application in March. The court of appeal gave no reason on Tuesday for rejecting Hanna’s application for leave to appeal.

Robert Hornung, who heads the Canadian Wind Energy Association, welcomed the decision.

He said in an interview that Ontario’s 550-metre setback regulation is “among the most stringent in North America.”

It had been established after a long process of consultation, Hornung said.

“This decision provides some certainty for the industry that indeed the regulatory framework will remain in place,” he said.

“That helps everyone in terms of project planning,” he said. It also removes an element of risk, he said.

Gillespie said that while the court had rejected Hanna’s application, the ruling left turbine opponents with other tools at their disposal.

The lower court ruling, he noted, expressly invited opponents to take their arguments to the province’s environmental review tribunal.

“They didn’t say the 550-metre setback is something that cannot be challenged,” Gillespie said.

“They said if you want to deal with that issue, it should be dealt with on a case by case basis before the environmental review tribunal.”

A review of a wind farm application before the tribunal is currently under way in Chatham-Kent, he noted. In that case, wind opponents are seeking to block the development. A decision is due in July.

Source:  John Spears, Business Reporter, www.thestar.com 21 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky