LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Approval of one Colebrook wind turbine may ease passage of another 

Credit:  By JASON SIEDZIK, The Register Citizen, www.registercitizen.com 4 June 2011 ~~

NEW BRITAIN – With Colebrook South passing the Connecticut Siting Council’s muster, its other half saw favorable opinions on Thursday.

The council released its draft findings of fact on June 2, as well as taking a straw poll to judge which way the winds might blow on the state’s second residential wind generation facility. Colebrook South – which was approved by the council at the June 2 meeting – had a 6-1 favorable result from its straw poll, and the Colebrook North proposal tentatively might pass by a wider margin.

According to Connecticut Siting Council executive director Linda Roberts, the council’s straw poll on Colebrook North – the project proposed for Rock Hall Road – found the participating members almost unanimously in favor of the plan. The council voted 7-0 in favor of approving the proposal, with only Phil Ashton voting “yes, possibly.” Ashton was the only vote against the Colebrook South proposal, which calls for turbines on Flagg Hill Road.

Each half of the overall BNE Energy project will generate 4.8 megawatts of electricity, according to the company’s proposal. Combined, the two wind farms could potentially produce four times Colebrook’s energy demand. Excess energy would go to neighboring towns such as Norfolk and Winchester.

One of the reasons that Colebrook South was approved and a similar plan in Prospect was rejected was due to the higher population density in Prospect. The draft findings of fact for Colebrook North reinforce this, as a chart lists the population densities of Connecticut (723 people per square mile), Litchfield County (204) and Colebrook (48).

Otherwise, the two proposals are fairly similar. This fact is noted in the draft findings of fact, which reference the similar topographical characteristics of Colebrook North and Colebrook South. Additionally, the draft findings of fact state, Colebrook South was the original proposal to come from BNE Energy, while the owner of the property that would become Colebrook North approached BNE Energy in the spring of 2010. BNE Energy entered into a long-term lease in July 2010, noting its similar characteristics to the Colebrook South site.

The Colebrook North proposal will come up for a vote on June 11. Votes on the previous two wind projects to go before the Connecticut Siting Council were identical to their respective straw polls. Colebrook South passed by a 6-1 vote, but Prospect was rejected by a 5-2 vote.

Source:  By JASON SIEDZIK, The Register Citizen, www.registercitizen.com 4 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky