[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Bluewater council votes for $25,000 annual turbine fee  

Credit:  Ben Forrest, Times-Advocate, www.southhuron.com 1 June 2011 ~~

VARNA – Municipality of Bluewater council passed a resolution May 16 to charge wind developers an annual $25,000 fee for each wind turbine erected in the municipality.

The decision, which passed 8-1 in a recorded vote, approved a recommendation from the municipality’s planning committee, which consists of all Bluewater councillors.

In the May 16 recorded vote, Mayor Bill Dowson and councillors Tyler Hessel, Dave Roy, John Gillespie, George Irvin, Janisse Zimmerman, Kay Wise and Geordie Palmer supported the $25,000 annual fee.

Hay East Coun. John Becker was the only member to vote against the fee. Deputy Mayor Paul Klopp declared a conflict of interest on the matter and did not participate in the vote.

Jim Fergusson, a former Bluewater councillor-at-large and 2010 mayoral candidate, suggested the idea of a $25,000 annual fee in a delegation to the planning committee May 9.

In an interview, Fergusson said what raised his level of concern on the issue was the number of Bluewater residents who expressed concern about turbines during the 2010 election campaign.

“They were concerned over the fact that if property values around the area of wind turbines decreased, that other remaining properties would have to increase to offset that decrease in property value,” Fergusson said.

“They were (in) fear of higher taxation.”

Fergusson said three concerns were identified during his delegation, one of which was property value.

He said the second concern was that “a percentage of the population do find turbines offensive.”

Fergusson said people expressed concern to him that “perhaps it may hurt the tourist value in Bluewater and that tourist-related businesses would suffer from a negative impact from the turbines.”

He said it was also expressed to him that it may be more difficult in the future for Bluewater to attract development and “it may impact the economy that way.”

To that end, the May 16 resolution calls for the $25,000 annual fee to be dedicated to the municipality’s Economic Development Committee “to fund their programs.”

During council’s discussion of the matter May 16, Becker questioned the $25,000 annual fee, asking where the delegation came up with it.

“They want this money to go to the economic development committee, which is a great idea, but through my speaking with people that have signed on lease agreements … this fee is quite enormous compared to what they’ve been told they would receive,” Becker said.

He later suggested $25,000 seems “very extreme.”

Fergusson said in an interview the suggested fee was based on data from the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and housing.

Bayfield Coun. Palmer suggested during council’s discussion of the matter that the number is not fixed, but a starting point.

Zurich Coun. Zimmerman said she would support the fee, “because we certainly have to start at a certain point.”

Council then voted to approve the fee.

In an interview Fergusson said the intent of the $25,000 fee was not to discourage wind developers from setting up in Bluewater.

“I don’t know if it would (discourage wind developers) or not,” he said. “The sole intent of the presentation was to offset any negative economic impact to the municipality.

Though Dowson and Klopp both declared a conflict of pecuniary interest at the May 9 planning meeting, Dowson did not declare a pecuniary interest May 16, citing legal advice.

Source:  Ben Forrest, Times-Advocate, www.southhuron.com 1 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.