[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind opponents push for action  

Credit:  Special to The Chronicle-Journal, www.chroniclejournal.com/ 18 May 2011 ~~

Turnout for another Horizon Wind public information session Tuesday was down from previous sessions, but Big Thunder Wing Park opponents’ frustration levels remain high.
More than 60 people were in attendance to voice concerns ranging from noise levels and environmental impact to construction on the Nor’Wester escarpment.
“I think a lot of it is fear of the unknown,” said Horizon president Tony Zwig. “People would like it to be somewhere else.”
The session, like those past, had a security detail on site, but the meeting was calm. Large groups of people gathered around Horizon representatives demanding answers to questions they say have been asked many times before.
Don Novasat said he has asked Horizon several times how it will gain access to the mountain sites to install the turbines.
“The best answer they gave me was evasive,” Novasat said.
Ron Lappage said he fears the potential destruction of cross-country ski trails, claiming that if the wind turbines are constructed in the area, there is no chance the trails could ever be reopened.
“She tried to make me feel better about it, but I still don’t,” Lappage said after a lengthy discussion with Horizon Wind project co-ordinator Nhung Nguyen.
“The reality of it is, wind turbines and cross-country ski trails cannot co-exist. They have a lot of other territory out there, and they should be looking at other areas that aren’t going to affect ski trails,” Lappage said.
There appeared to be a general consensus among those opposed to the project that while Horizon may be listening to their concerns, it is not doing anything to address them.
“They can go on and on with these meetings, but unless they actually listen and take the appropriate actions, they are not achieving anything,” said Lappage.
Crysta Baccari, who has just returned to Thunder Bay, said she felt the growing frustration after attending her first meeting on Tuesday.
She called the project wasteful, claiming that Thunder Bay already has green energy, and that people in the community as a whole are not aware of the negative impact the wind project will have on the city.
“I don’t feel like the concerns are being heard,” Baccari said. “If people’s concerns were being heard, this project would be completely stopped, as it should be.”
Another public meeting is to start at 6 p.m. today at the Fort William Country Club.

Source:  Special to The Chronicle-Journal, www.chroniclejournal.com/ 18 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.