[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Connecticut renewable energy standards up for review  

Credit:  By Brad Kane, Hartford Business Journal, www.hartfordbusiness.com 12 April 2011 ~~

Proposed changes to what some lawmakers say is Connecticut’s costly and unscientific renewable portfolio standards will be made in June, giving state leaders time to review the 13-year-old policy.

The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board is reviewing the state’s 13-year-old renewable portfolio standards (RPS) that by 2020 calls for 20 percent of the Connecticut’s electricity to come Class I renewables such as wind and solar.

At a Monday hearing at the Department of Environmental Protection headquarters in Hartford, the board met with legislators and industry stakeholders to review the impact of the standards’ implementation over the next nine years.

State Rep. Vickie Nardello, D-Prospect, co-chair of the General Assembly’s Energy & Technology Committee, said the 20 percent by 2020 goal was more designed as a catchy slogan than anything based on data or planned in regard for cost and long-term impact.

The Connecticut Energy Advisory Board (CEAB) is reviewing the RPS with regard to whether or not the goal is attainable, what the immediate and long-term costs will be, and what sources of electricity generation should count as renewable.

The CEAB plans to issue its recommendations in early June to the General Assembly and other key government officials, said Jeff Gaudiosi, CEAB chair.

No scientific study has been completed to assess the financial impact of the RPS, but estimates from the Department of Public Utility Control say the costs could be $500 million annually or more. That cost would be borne by the ratepayers.

At the hearing, State Sen. John Fonfara, D-Hartford, co-chair of the legislature’s Energy & Technology Committee, said one of the hardest aspects of the RPS is reconciling the high costs of implementing the goals with calls to reduce the state’s electricity prices, which are the second highest in the nation.

One of the overarching themes from commenters at the hearing was the need for Connecticut to become more stable and predictable in its energy policies and regulations, removing uncertainty to developers undertaking the costly task of building renewable energy plants.

Other topics touched on include whether energy efficiency efforts should be given a bigger role in the RPS, if Connecticut should enter into a regional RPS in New England, and how Connecticut can use its RPS to spur research and development, jobs and technology in the state’s borders.

Source:  By Brad Kane, Hartford Business Journal, www.hartfordbusiness.com 12 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter