[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Turbines on trial as judges hear UWO witness  

Credit:  By Jonathan Sher, The London Free Press, www.lfpress.com 25 January 2011 ~~

TORONTO – The fate of the billion-dollar wind industry and the future of green energy in Ontario may now rest in the hands of three divisional-court judges.

The province’s Green Energy Act was put to the test Monday before a panel of three Superior Court justices over a clash that has played out in many Ontario communities – are wind turbines a savior of the environment or a risk to human health to those who live in their shadow?

The stakes are huge: Dalton McGuinty has staked his political fortunes and the province’s economic future largely on building a green-energy industry.

But in court Monday. the case likely turned on fine points of law that left non-lawyers with glazed eye in the packed courtroom at Osgoode Hall.

The sum of those points is this: Did then-Environment Minister John Gerretsen over-step his authority when he recommended how far turbines should be from homes?

Lawyer Eric Gillespie, who is representing a Prince Edward County man challenging the Minister, laid out his case:

* The Minister didn’t rely on medical advisors, instead using exerts in unrelated fields such as land use planning and acoustics.

* The failure to consult doctors was a critical defect because medical professional are not sure if wind turbines cause harm to health.

* The process was flawed because the government’s own statement of environmental values calls on decision makers to not act if there is uncertainty whether harm will be caused – the so-called precautionary principle.

“There does not appear anyone who had the requisite qualifications to provide advice to the Minister,” Gillespie told the panel.

The government’s lawyer, Sara Blake, defended the process, saying it was enough that the Minister reviewed scientific studies, then attacked the credibility of doctors cited by Gillespie.

Taking aim at a former dean of the medical school at the University of Western Ontario, Blake said he was acting as an advocate, not a scientist, because area near his home on Prince Edward County was targeted for possible wind farms.

“He’s not an expert. He’s an advocate against wind farms,” she said.

The three judges wrapped up the hearing, saying they were hopeful they’d reach a judgment soon.

That the judges are deliberating at all was a win for opponents to wind power – Blake argued the court lacked jurisdiction to hear a challenge she said belonged before an environmental tribunal set up by the government.

The clearing of that hurdle opened the door to challenging Green Energy Act provision that turbines need be only 550 metres from homes.

Wind power is the star in Ontario’s renewable-energy plan – the government wants to double its output this year and ramp it up to provide 10 percent of energy output over 20 years.

Energy is also a key political dividing line for the Ontario election in October.

Those who say the turbines harm health say the mega-devices emit low-pitched sounds which some doctors say disrupt the body’s rhythms and cause headaches, tinnitus, dizziness, nausea, rapid heart rate, irritability and problems with concentration and memory.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  By Jonathan Sher, The London Free Press, www.lfpress.com 25 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch