[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Will Hammond’s ethics code affect wind voting? 

Credit:  By Matt McAllister, The Journal, www.ogd.com 11 January 2011 ~~

HAMMOND – Will the Hammond Town Board’s newly adopted code of ethics have any effect on board members’ voting on wind energy development?

That was the big question from the public Monday as the town board voted unanimously to pass Local Law #1 of 2011 – the updated Code of Ethics for the Town of Hammond.

Only a few citizens spoke up during the public hearing before voting on the new law occurred, including Howard W. Demick, a former town judge, who first lauded the town board for the steps taken to develop the new law.

“This is a positive step forward,” Mr. Demick said. “Essential to good practice and required by New York State law.”

One area Mr. Demick commented upon further involved conflict of interest. He suggested that the document lacked a mechanism for dealing with non-compliance. Three additions are necessary, according to Mr. Demick, including a disclosure statement upon such a conflict arising; an ethics review board to review and ensure compliance; as well as a more formal identification of penalties and repercussions, if and when a conflict of interest problem arises.

“To address the Hammond wind law any further without this would be a mistake,” Mr. Demick said. “You are either ethically challenged or not. There’s no in between.”

Mary D. Hamilton, president of Concerned Residents of Hammond, said the timing for the new law couldn’t be better. With the current one-year moratorium on wind development set to expire in late July and the wind committee getting ever closer to turning wind law work back over to the town board, she said, the proof will be in the pudding.

“The first big test for this document is rapidly approaching,” Mrs. Hamilton said, adding, “This needs to be in place before further discussion on the wind law begins.”

Merritt V. Young, a member of the wind committee, was the final citizen to speak.

“If this law is passed,” he asked the board, “will present board members be required to disclose their ongoing conflicts of interest?”

Town board member James Pitcher, who has signed a wind lease with Iberdrola Renewables, has been recusing himself from wind discussions for quite some time. James E. Langtry, another board member, has not yet recused himself, despite a wind lease signed by his sister, Susan Dunham.

“There are members of this board who lack the moral fortitude to adhere,” to the code of ethics, Mr. Young said. “One of them thinks that ethics is just a word in the dictionary that doesn’t apply to him.”

Dr. James R. Tague, who worked alongside Mr. Pitcher in developing the new code, said some of the suggestions voiced Monday could be addressed through amendments.

“I’d like to see it moved forward as soon as possible,” Dr. Tague said.

Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram then made a motion to adopt the new code, with Douglas E. Delosh seconding.

“It’s a non-functionable law as it is,” Mr. Bertram said. “At this point, I would like to see this law passed.”

The board then voted 5-0 to pass the new code of ethics.

Source:  By Matt McAllister, The Journal, www.ogd.com 11 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon