[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Power to the people as wind farm development rejected on appeal  

Credit:  Hull Daily Mail, www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk 11 January 2011 ~~

It has taken seven attempts, but battling East Riding residents have finally fought off plans for a wind farm development.

Planning inspectors upheld all previous wind farm appeals in the East Riding.

On each occasion, the local authority had to pay out £60,000 in legal costs, raising questions about the validity of turning down such applications by energy developers.

But for the first time in the East Riding, a planning inspector has dismissed a wind farm development on appeal.

Energie Kontor wanted to build three turbines on land at Hogsea Lane, Roos, near Withernsea.

But the proposals were rejected, with councillors saying there were already too many wind farms granted planning permission for that area.

Consent has already been given for wind farms in Roos at Sunderland Farm and Tedder Hill.

Chair of Hilston and Tunstall Residents’ Association, Jackie Cracknell said: “We are only a small group of residents so being able to achieve this is great.

“We are not against renewable energy but it has to be done in the right way.

“It has restored our faith in the planning system to some degree but I still think it needs to be looked at.”

Fellow campaigner Dr Brian Wells has also welcomed the decision.

He said: “We always felt we had a good case as there are far too many wind farms in the area. Some residents would have seen turbines wherever they turned.

“We have been fighting this for four years and always felt our case was strong.

“Wind farms are okay but it is not acceptable if they are in the wrong place.”

Council leader Councillor Stephen Parnaby is also relieved.

He said: “Finally, our perseverance has paid off but we had a good case.”

In dismissing the appeal, planning inspector Andrew Pykett said: “I have concluded that the proposal would increase the numbers of turbines and wind farms in the area to an extent where the resultant harm would outweigh the presumption in favour of such schemes.”

UK general manager at Energie Kontor Peter Harrison admitted the result is a blow.

He said: “We are obviously very disappointed by the decision and we are considering our position.”

Source:  Hull Daily Mail, www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk 11 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.