[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Connecticut residents see Massachusetts wind power up close 

Credit:  By STEPHEN SINGER, The Associated Press, www.businessweek.com 6 December 2010 ~~

Residents of Prospect concerned about a proposal to build wind power turbines in their small Connecticut town have gotten a close-up look at a wind project in neighboring Massachusetts to see what they might be up against.

Mayor Robert Chatfield hired a bus and took nearly three dozen residents to Cape Cod on a recent weekend to look at a wind turbine on Falmouth property and to talk to neighbors.

“When I first heard of it, I thought it was the best thing since sliced bread,” the mayor said. “Now I’ve kind of backed off a little bit.”

Chatfield said most of those who took the bus trip were opposed to the proposal. He said the project has been the most contentious issue in town since the late 1990s when plans to build a regional high school drew opposition.

BNE Energy Inc. of West Hartford wants to build two 1.6-megawatt wind turbines. The company did not immediately return a call Monday.

On its application to the Connecticut Siting Council, BNE Energy said its “Wind Prospect” project will not result in air emissions, will have minimal impacts on state water quality standards and will advance Connecticut’s energy policy by developing renewable energy resources.

Chatfield said the project would bring the town $150,000 a year in taxes, a small contribution to Prospect’s budget of $7 million and millions more in school spending.

Jerry Potamis, wastewater superintendent at Falmouth, greeted the Prospect visitors on his day off.

He said one turbine has been operating since March at the town’s wastewater plant and another is planned. The turbine so far has generated revenue of $164,000 and is expected to bring in additional $99,000 in less than a year, he said.

“It’s definitely a cash cow,” Potamis said.

During the planning stages, no one opposed the project, he said. But that has changed because of noise produced by the turbine.

“There’s a growing number of people that don’t like it visually or say they don’t like the whooshing noise,” Potamis said.

Prospect neighbors of the proposed project cite, among other complaints, noise and flickering sunlight produced by the turbines.

Resident Tim Reilly, who visited Falmouth, said the proposed turbines would be 1,800 feet from his house. Speaking to Falmouth residents unhappy with the wind turbine gave him new insight, he said.

“It was eye-opening to hear the personal accounts,” he said.

Reilly, a high school marketing teacher, and other residents say the project is potentially dangerous to public safety, health, quality of life, wildlife and real estate values.

“These things should not be in anyone’s back yards,” he said. “These things should be on a mountain range, on a bay somewhere.”

Other pressures working against the project include Connecticut’s energy goals. The state set goals 10 years ago to increase renewable energy in its portfolio of power sources, but an annual plan submitted to state regulators earlier this year sought significant increases in megawatts generated by sources other than wind – landfill gas, hydro power, biomass, fuel cells and solar energy.

In addition, Falmouth may have better prospects generating wind power than Connecticut. The Cape has a superior location near the Atlantic Ocean, while Connecticut does not have access to the stiff winds generated by the ocean and has no mountains to produce so-called wind corridors.

Linda Roberts, executive director of the Connecticut Siting Council, said the agency has 60 days from the Nov. 17 filing of the proposal to take action on it.

Source:  By STEPHEN SINGER, The Associated Press, www.businessweek.com 6 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky