[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind report omits major issues; Report on proposed law contains no suggestions on noise, setbacks  

Credit:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, www.watertowndailytimes.com 15 November 2010 ~~

MORRISTOWN – When the Morristown Wind Committee presented the Town Council with its proposed wind energy law in May, the document lacked noise standards and setback distances.

The board then turned to its consultants, LaBella Associates, to address the issues committee members said they didn’t feel qualified to address.

Now, six months later, LaBella has turned its version of the wind energy law to the town filled with suggestions – none of which addresses noise or setbacks.

“Before suggestions for the completion of this section can be offered, further discussion with the committee or with the board will be necessary to understand the town’s intent,” wrote Mark W. Tayrien, LaBella’s planning director.

“Simply put, given the residential density typically found in upstate N.Y., there is no feasible way to simply compute an appropriate setback or constraint that would be acceptable in all instances,” he wrote. “What could be seen as too strict in one community could just as easily be viewed as too lenient in another.”

Town Supervisor Frank L. Putman said the board now has to address those issues without the benefit of recommendations from either the wind committee or consultants.

“They’re in effect saying that these are areas that are going to be specific to our community and that they want us to put something in the law for them to review,” Mr. Putman said. “We, in our brain, thought that LaBella would make suggestions for the establishment of these two factors. This leaves us with that to decide.”

Faced with few options, Mr. Putman said, the town will now look at “similar laws that are working in other places.”

The town paid LaBella $3,500 for its consulting services.

No meetings or hearings have been scheduled to continue work on the wind law, though the Town Council next meets at 7 p.m. Dec. 14.

Source:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, www.watertowndailytimes.com 15 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.