Your editorial bias was most evident in your article on the Brewster planning board meeting (“Turbine proposal generates praise, complaints,” Nov. 11).
The praises for the project were listed first, complaints next. At the meeting, there were 3-to-1 speakers opposed to this proposal.
It’s a quality-of-life issue. Is anyone listening to the hundreds of people nearby who run the risk of being affected by these turbines?
|Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding