[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Vermont utilities agree to buy wind power from New Hampshire 

Credit:  By David Gramm, The Associated Press, www.bangordailynews.com 22 October 2010 ~~

MONTPELIER, Vt. – Vermont’s two largest electric utilities say they’ve signed contracts to buy power from a wind-power project in northern New Hampshire even as the debate over in-state wind projects rages.

Rutland-based Central Vermont Public Service Corp. and Colchester-based Green Mountain Power Corp. will take more than 80 percent of the power to be produced by the Granite Reliable Power Windpark in Coos County, N.H. Prices for the power have not been disclosed.

“Vermonters have clearly stated their desire for clean, low-emission, renewable energy if it can be obtained at an affordable cost, and this contract meets all of those criteria,” CVPS President Bob Young and GMP President Mary Powell said in a joint statement.

Both companies had previously signed contracts to take power from the Granite Reliable project; in Thursday’s announcement, they said would increase those amounts so that CVPS will take 50.3 percent of the 99-megawatt project, while GMP will take 32 percent.

Vermont lawmakers have passed several bills in recent years to push the state’s power companies to rely more on renewable power, but developers have had a hard time getting such projects through a tough state permit process.

Wherever the projects have been proposed, local groups have sprung up to oppose them, supported by the statewide group Vermonters for a Clean Environment. Opponents cite damage to forests from building roads to support the projects, harm to wildlife and choking mountain streams with dirt during construction.

On Thursday, the group Energize Vermont filed a motion in the state Environmental Court asking it to order a halt to a 16-turbine wind project in Sheffield in northeastern Vermont. It said the developer, Boston-based First Wind, was violating its state environmental permit and damaging mountain streams.

First Wind denied any violation. The company has projects in Maine, and has started final construction of its $130 million Rollins Mountain wind project with hopes of having it finished by April 1, officials said last week.

“The opponents of renewable wind power have misrepresented the facts,” spokesman John Lamontagne said in a statement. “We’re building this project in a highly environmentally responsible manner, in full compliance with all laws and regulations, and that will continue as we move ahead with the project.”

Gov. Jim Douglas has opposed what he calls “industrial-scale” wind power projects on Vermont’s mountain ridges, saying they would harm the state’s scenic beauty.

Douglas is stepping down after four two-year terms and both major candidates seeking to replace him, Democrat Peter Shumlin and Republican Brian Dubie, are more sympathetic to wind power development.

The push for renewable power comes as Vermont Yankee – the state’s lone nuclear power plant – is scheduled to see its federal and state operating licenses expire in March 2012. The plant, currently a source of about one-third of the electricity used in Vermont, is seeking a license renewal, but lawmakers voted last winter to reject that.

Leaders of four environmental groups gathered Thursday to encourage development of more large-scale wind farms in Vermont.

The Conservation Law Foundation, Vermont League of Conservation Voters Education Fund, Vermont Natural Resources Council and Vermont Public Interest Research Group extolled the virtues of wind energy as a source of power that does not contribute to climate change.

Meanwhile, Vermonters for a Clean Environment said large-scale wind is just more corporate energy, and small homegrown solar projects are the way to go.

Source:  By David Gramm, The Associated Press, www.bangordailynews.com 22 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon