LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME



[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine for aquaculturist would actually boost costs 

Credit:  Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 23 October 2010 ~~

I offer a rebuttal to your Oct. 12 editorial, “Just one turbine.”

Recently, I had the opportunity to present some of the objections at the Old King’s Highway Regional Historic District appeals board.

You write that Aquacultural Research Corp. faces a financial hardship with its $100,000 utility bill. However, even after taxpayers fund $900,000 in grants to ARC, the purchase of a $2.2 million wind turbine and maintenance costs would increase ARC’s utility bill by approximately 25 percent.

As I stated before the appeals board, the only way for this project to be feasible is for ARC to become an energy-selling utility or to sell the turbine to a third-party developer that could benefit from the federal, state and town tax write-offs.

You say the economic benefit to one local business is worth altering the very essence of the historic district. I think tens of thousands of homeowners and visitors would disagree. This turbine would affect not only Dennis residents. The closest neighbors are at Gray’s Beach in Yarmouthport. Furthermore, at least six agricultural properties along Route 6A would have every right to demand their own turbines.

This is one turbine too many.

Richard Watts

Dennis

Source:  Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 23 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky