[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind-turbine rules should be subject to change 

Credit:  Appleton Post Crescent, www.postcrescent.com 12 October 2010 ~~

There’s a lot we don’t know about the possible negative health effects of wind turbines.

We know there are studies that show few problems related to living near a turbine. We know there are studies that show more problems related to living near a turbine.

We know some people who live near a turbine say they have no problems. We know some people who live near a turbine say they have serious problems.

What we don’t know is a true conclusion – a definitive answer. Perhaps it’s because some wind turbines pose a problem, while others don’t. Perhaps it’s because some people are more susceptible to health problems while living near a turbine, and others aren’t.

We just don’t know for sure.

That’s why we agree with a statement by a member of the state’s Public Service Commission, which approved new wind turbine siting rules last month. Lauren Azar said that the PSC has the ability to revise the siting rules, if information about health effects arises.

In a letter to a legislative committee that also has to approve the rules, Azar wrote, “While I support the overall rule because it will promote the development of wind in Wisconsin, the rule fails to provide a much-needed safety net for people whose health declines because of a wind turbine located near their home. As new information becomes available, the Commission can revise this rule.”

The siting rules, developed by a task force stacked with wind-energy proponents, create uniform standards for where turbines can be placed. The goal was to establish a statewide standard, rather than patchwork rules determined by counties or other municipalities.

The goal should also be to protect public health. Given how much we don’t know, Azar’s statement makes sense.

Source:  Appleton Post Crescent, www.postcrescent.com 12 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky