[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm consultations come under fire from NMEPC  

Credit:  by James Murray, netnewsledger.com 5 October 2010 ~~

THUNDER BAY – The Nor’wester Mountain Escarpment Protection Committee today released its own Public Consultation Report which outlines their events, news items, meetings and programs held to date regarding the proposed industrial wind farm on the Nor’Wester Mountains.

The original report is being sent to Doris Dumais, Director of the Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch for the Ministry of the Environment. The MOE requires all wind energy project proponents to conduct proper public consultation to satisfy their Renewable Energy Application.

The required community consultation is expected to take place early in the project; unfortunately this did not happen according to the NMEPC. “Horizon Wind reported they began this project in 2005 and the community learned of the project late in 2009. The City of Thunder Bay did not engage in any public consultation whatsoever since signing a license in 2006 and an Option to Lease in 2007. Due to the lack of true public consultation efforts, the Committee felt it necessary to document their own Public Consultation including their four Open Houses, weekly and monthly Community Meetings and prepare this Report”, according to a statement released earlier today from the group.

Irene Bond, President for the NMEPC says “We feel that there has been very little truthful, technical knowledge provided to the community and therefore undertook an educational campaign. The lack of an open, transparent, timely process is what brought our group together.”

Bond states, “Even Horizon’s Open Houses were held far too late in the process as evidenced in their answer to the question: “Why can’t the turbines be located farther from the residents, the protected peregrine falcon, the rare to our area maple forest, the ski area, the cross-country trail system, since you had 17,000 acres to work with?”

NMEPC continues, “The answer “We won’t move them because we won’t”. (Horizon’s Project Coordinator at Open House, Blake Hall, August 25, 2010).

Bond added “The presence of armed security including Apex Security, OPP, City of Thunder Bay Police, left some residents intimidated. The Open House format made it very difficult to ask even the simplest question. We feel responses to our concerns have been evasive and very vague, and at times, insulting to those professionals who live in the area and understand the implications of changes to the environment, the watershed, the hydro grid, power costs, health concerns, view sheds, tourism, etc.”

The NMEPC strongly feel that all these issues should have been addressed and openly discussed with the public and that without all the facts and information, the Ministry of Environment, City Council or the public cannot make appropriate decisions, nor can they have a true sense or reflection of what really will be impacted. Bond adds, “Through this document we are asking the MOE that they require Horizon Wind Inc. to establish a proper public consultation process as necessary to satisfy their Renewable Energy Application.”

The NMEPC public consultation events and open information sessions were voluntarily researched, promoted and produced for the benefit of educating all community residents.

Source:  by James Murray, netnewsledger.com 5 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.