[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

No wind power backer agrees to debate  

Credit:  Kennebec Journal, www.kjonline.com 30 August 2010 ~~

About six weeks ago, I submitted a letter to the newspaper inviting proponents and opponents of industrial wind development on Maine mountaintops to publicly debate the issue.

I have received responses from opponents, but none from former Gov. Angus King or any other proponents. I name King here because recent media attention has been given to this subject, and he has been mentioned as an ardent supporter of the industry.

I strongly urge King and other proponents of mountaintop industrial wind development to participate in a public debate about the subject. If they are confident of the veracity and basis of statements they have made about the benefits and advantages presented by industrial wind, then they need to support their position.

King’s critics charge that his sole motivation is greed, that he desires to line his pockets with millions of taxpayer dollars, and that mountaintop industrial wind is a horrendous mistake.

Also, claims have been made that he acted in collusion with the Baldacci administration to weaken Maine’s environmental laws and standards, which were developed long ago to protect our natural resources and quality of life, in order to advance his agenda. This was accomplished through the passage of L.D. 2283, the expedited siting law.

Proponents of mountaintop industrial wind development need to address these claims, and their failure to respond to this challenge leaves the public wondering if greater credence should be given to opponents’ allegations. They should agree to a debate in order to clarify the situation and address any misinformation that exists.

David Small


Source:  Kennebec Journal, www.kjonline.com 30 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch