LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Patrick presses ‘new economy’ to mixed reviews 

Hanging high in the chambers of the Massachusetts House of Representatives is the wooden sculpture of a cod fish – a silent reminder of what was once the backbone of state’s economy.

If the dreams of Gov. Deval Patrick and top lawmakers come true, the “sacred cod” may one day be swapped for a “sacred hydrogen fuel cell,” “sacred photovoltaic panel” or even a “sacred wind turbine.”

In his first two years in office, and with the help of a Democrat-led House and Senate, Patrick has set about to imagine a new economy for the state.

From clean energy to biotechnology, casinos to filmmaking, Patrick has pushed to diversify the state’s job base beyond the traditional areas of financial services, manufacturing and high technology.

By seizing early ground in the development and production of new technologies, and backing up those efforts with investment dollars, Patrick hopes Massachusetts will avoid past mistakes where it had sprinted to am early lead, only to see brains and capital slip away.

But big dreams don’t come cheap.

Patrick’s signature effort, a 10-year plan to make Massachusetts a leader in life sciences, carries a $1 billion price tag. Another bill sponsored by House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi would funnel $13 million a year over five years into the development of “green jobs.”

Patrick said the new economy, with an emphasis on innovation in health care and clean energy, plays to Massachusetts’s natural strengths.

“It’s a big upside for us,” Patrick said. “It’s an economy that depends on innovation, on high tech, on brain power, on some of the assets that we have in concentration already here in the commonwealth.”

Not everyone is as enthusiastic.

Patrick has had to fend off criticism from the state’s longtime industries and business owners who are feeling left out as administration officials and lawmakers swoon over flashy new technologies.

“We are concerned about businesses and industries that have made significant investments who wouldn’t benefit from these initiatives,” said Brian Gilmore, of the Associated Industries of Massachusetts, which represents 7,000 Bay State employers.

What’s particularly grating, business groups say, is the sense that the state is trying to pick winners and losers by favoring certain industries.

Add that to Patrick’s signing of a new state budget that relies on $285 million in new revenues from closing so-called corporate tax “loopholes” – and his recommendation that employers kick in another $33 million to help bail out the state’s landmark 2006 health care – and not everyone is cheering.

“We need an economic growth strategy that will benefit all parts of the state,” Gilmore said.

Not all of Patrick’s efforts have been so cutting-edge.

Along with the Legislature, Patrick pushed for film tax credits, which have lured big budget movies to Massachusetts. He also pushed a plan to license three resort-style casinos here – an effort opposed by House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi. That bill died in the House but could be refiled next year.

But Patrick’s main focus has been on innovative technologies.

Colin South is president of one of the companies at the forefront of the new economy.

Mascoma Corp., founded in late 2005, is pursuing the next generation of biofuels with cellulosic ethanol technology. South said Massachusetts is an ideal incubator for companies like his that rely on access to venture capital and a highly trained work force.

“In Massachusetts, people understand the startup culture and have the skills that we can apply rapidly, and that is a huge advantage,” he said.

Equally important, South said, is that, although the company will ultimately have plants in multiple states, he plans to keep the top offices in Massachusetts.

“We don’t foresee ourselves having to move out of here to get what we need to run an effective corporate operation,” he said.

State Environmental Secretary Ian Bowles said the state’s rush to lure and nurture clean energy and biotechnology companies isn’t meant as a slight to other, more traditional businesses, but is a recognition by Patrick that those newer companies are where the biggest potential growth is now.

“It’s not saying that other parts of the economy aren’t vitally important,” he said. “But I think he’s really putting a priority in these areas because these are industries that are going to grow nationwide.”

Bowles pointed to one of the biggest generators of new, cutting edge technology firms – the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

MIT has helped give birth to companies like Watertown-based A123Systems, one of the world’s leading suppliers of high-power lithium ion batteries, and Marlboro-based Solar panel maker Evergreen Solar Inc., which just has signed a sales contract with Germany’s IBC Solar AG worth $1.2 billion.

Patrick said those kind of success stories are good for the environment and good for the struggling Massachusetts economy.

“What a great thing to be able to address our energy needs, our environmental stewardship and grow the economy all at the same time,” he said.

By Steve LeBlanc
Associated Press

North Adams Transcript

21 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky