LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No turbines planned for severed land in Dover 

Wind turbines would not be permitted on a parcel of land to be severed from a Dover Township farm, says a municipal planner.

Rob Brown, representing Chatham-Kent, made the comment at a planning meeting on May 12.
Enio and Linda Sullo have an offer to purchase the 60-acre farm located on the west side of Bear Line Rd. between Pain Court Line and Creek Line.

The dwelling on the property is surplus to the farm operation and the Sullos have made an application to sever the 58 acres of surrounding farmland to be sold and keep a 2.13-acre lot containing an existing dwelling.

Pete Van Veen, a neighbour of the Sullos, was concerned that if the property was severed, a wind turbine could be set up at a later date.

Property values

Van Veen, who lives at the corner of Bear Line and Pain Court Line, was worried about his property values decreasing if a wind turbine was erected. He added that there isn’t enough information about the potential effects of wind turbines.

Van Veen said he had no intention of stopping the severance.

“I’m happy they got the severance. My concern wasn’t for my property, but for the property of Chatham-Kent residents.”

Van Veen said that setbacks should be 1.5 kilometres from residences instead of the current 750 metres.

Anyone who might want to put up one in the future would have to come to council to get zoning approval, Brown said.

Coun. Bill Weaver said he had sympathy for Van Veen, but added that the issue of wind turbines “is not in play” at a planning meeting.

Brian Cleeve

Chatham This Week

21 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky