[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbines hazardous to wildlife habitat, Milner says 

An Amherst area resident is continuing his fight to stop a proposed wind farm on the marsh near the town.

Jim Milner, who lives on the John Black Road, is preparing a submission to the project environmental assessment claiming that its existence threatens the future of the John Lusby Marsh as a wildlife habitat.

“Wildlife is the property of the Crown so it is the duty of the province to protect wildlife, not sell to the lowest proponent bidder,” Milner said in his submission.

“Environment Canada is responsible for preserving and enhancing the quality of the natural environment and it needs to be respected, protected and conserved. These areas must be avoided for the use of turbines.”

Earlier this month, Nova Scotia Power and Accionia Energy announced plans to construct a 20-turbine windfarm on the marsh near Exit 3 of the Trans-Canada Highway. Construction is expected to begin next April and be operational as early as five months later.

Milner said the process is flawed because studies surrounding migratory bird paths were not conducted during peak periods and suggests the province ignored potential adverse affects on the John Lusby Marsh.

“How can a proponent demonstrate that there are no significant adverse disturbances on the John Lusby Marsh? If so, put up a bond to prove it,” he said, questioning how negative impacts to the eco-system and the marsh can be avoided.

Milner said the marsh area and the LaPlanche River receive high numbers of migratory birds every year. It’s his believe that giant turbines and spinning blades will change migratory patterns and threaten the birds themselves.

He’s also not convinced with claims that shadow flicker will be minimized on both motorists on the nearby highway and in the town, which is a few kilometres from the site. He also believes the county’s siting guidelines are flawed because the minimum setback of 500 metres or three times the turbine high only applies to homes.

This is not Milner’s first time fighting the project. Several years ago he took the original project to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board causing a delay that indirectly led to its abandonment after capital costs went up.

The deadline for environmental submissions is Thursday.

By Darrell Cole

The Amherst Daily News

13 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky