[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind project review should be reinstated  

As someone who lives closer than 3,000 feet to the site where Competitive Energy Service (CES) wants to erect at least three 400-foot wind turbines, I am concerned.

Our vote on reinstating the commercial development review ordinance is not about stopping the project, but putting some guidelines in place for protection.

After all, representatives from CES helped write the ordinance so that the project could be developed; it should not stop the project unless they do not follow their own guidelines.

In a letter to the residents of Freedom in May of last year, the developers stated the following when asking the residents of Freedom to repeal the ordinance we are now trying to reinstate:

“Furthermore, CES has committed to building the very same project that was proposed, extensively reviewed, and ultimately approved by the Town Planning Board if the Ordinances are repealed.

This commitment includes using turbines with the same or lower maximum sound output, meeting the same setbacks to residences and property lines, and complying with every single one of the items listed in Article 8 Section 5 of the Ordinances titled ‘Wind Energy Facility Siting And Construction.'”

If they are willing to comply with every one of the items listed, why did they ask the residents to repeal the ordinance? By reinstating the ordinance, we will have a legal way to hold any developer accountable to protect abutters’ rights.

Please vote to reinstate the commercial development review ordinance on June 10.

Mary Ann Bennett


Morning Sentinel

14 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.