[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Brown’s proposal makes real sense  

Some have suggested that Coun. Jim Brown has pulled numbers out of a hat in requesting strict minimum setbacks for wind turbines (“Setbacks deferred,” Chatham Daily News, May 6). Possibly, but that doesn’t mean there are fewer brains under Brown’s cap than under those worn by the various power companies bidding for our skies.

Certainly there is more heart in Brown’s proposal, and his reluctance to roll over and play dead should be applauded rather than criticized for lacking “science.”

Let’s get one thing straight: These power companies do not love us. Our geography is a means to an end (the building of turbines for the collection of vast subsidies and tax credits). Our shorelines are desirable insofar as the wind accumulates there. The birdlife is a problem to be “solved” by hired ornithologists. Ditto the wildlife: just ask the biologist who rents himself out to the latest company pitching for approval. Immediate and future local employment prospects are negligible.

The municipal tax department and a scattering of landowners will gain some rent money, and the rest of us will endure these things, or we will move.

The very least we can ask for is the basic protection offered by meaningful setbacks from those small things that some of us still care about: our homes, our lakes, our wetlands and woods, our bird migration and staging areas – those small things that give a life meaning.

At about twice the height of Chatham’s ethanol stack, these turbines are going to be in almost everyone’s back yard visually. For those to whom a view still matters, this is a steep price indeed. It seems to me that Coun. Brown’s is a very modest proposal in light of what we are being asked to sacrifice.

Bobbi Plumridge


Chatham Daily News

12 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.