[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Voters soundly reject coastal wind study 

The nays had in on March 8th when the voters at the Harpswell, Maine, annual town meeting took up the issue of a proposed wind study on Long Reach Mountain.

If the study had proved that there was sufficient wind, it would have set in motion a proposal by a resident to site 3-4 wind turbines on town property. Old growth forest and a unique coastal cliff hiking trail would have been at risk if wind energy was developed on this steep and narrow ridge. Nearby property owners also would have been severely impacted.

The moderator had limited discussion to the merits of conducting a meteorological study and did not allow discussion of the potential impacts of a project if the wind proved sufficient.

“Getting the cart before the horse” was the basic theme of the opponents. Lack of long-range plans for the property, lack of wind (based on wind map modeling and local data), denial of of an RERL grant for a wind study (due to low wind), etc. were all cited by opponents of the project.

Before being cut off by the moderator, a few speakers tested his patience and that of the voters – who were by now tired from the excess of hot wind generated by the 22 articles over 3-1/2 hours that preceded the wind study vote – by getting a few words in on the the likely site impacts of such a project it it came to fruition.

Only one person, the original project proponent, spoke in favor.

Special to National Wind Watch

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky