[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine proponents want unfettered reign  

Re: Policies Must Please All, Jan. 4, by Austin Hughes.

I am addressing Mr. Hughes’ attempt to influence the Essex County steering committee on the renewable energy draft planning policy put forward by the Jones Consulting group.

In the absence of adequate provincial policy for location of industrial wind turbines, the county hired Jones Consulting to set some parameters that make sense for Essex County.

I also attended the Dec. 13 meeting Mr. Hughes refers to. Jones Consulting presented what appeared to me as a compromise between the needs of the industry for available land use and the concerns of residents regarding migration routes and setbacks from populated rural areas and residences.

Their proposal allowed 50 per cent of the county for virtually unrestricted turbine development. The recommended five-kilometre buffer zone from the shores of lakes St. Clair, Erie and the Detroit River, would limit the placement and number of turbines in the most-populated areas and keep them from major migration routes.

Rather than be satisfied with the proposal, developers and landowners attacked Jones representatives for putting restrictions on them.

It became apparent Jones Consulting had been ambushed by developers and landowners who had signed leases and been promised big bucks.

Mr. Hughes’ plea for intelligent land use policy can be easily interpreted by this writer into a policy of greed for government subsidies and free reign for them to install turbines whenever and wherever they deem appropriate.

I urge the county planning committee to resist the tactics of some developers and landowners and accept the compromise of the Jones group. Keeping turbines from populated rural areas and flyways makes sense and will go a long way toward circumventing litigation from affected residents.

Bill Anderson


Essex County Wind Action Group

The Windsor Star

8 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.