[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Election board decides wind turbine ballot question 

Jefferson Township voters may get a say on how they feel about the township’s current wind turbine zoning ordinance if a Friday decision of the Logan County Election Board withstands any other legal challenges.

Following a three-hour public hearing, Election Board Chairwoman Ann Beck read a two-page written decision in which the board rejected a challenge by township landowners to the issue being placed on the March 4 ballot.

“I think they found the only way they could,” township resident and wind turbine opponent Keith Nason said. “Now the voters will get to have their say as they should.”

But the legal challenges may not be over. Attorney Joseph Miller and the two residents who want wind turbines on their property who attended the hearing said they are “considering all options,” which could include an appeal to the judicial system.

The Jefferson Township Trustees failed in September to override an ordinance written by landowners and passed unanimously by the township’s zoning board. Many residents believe the ordinance is too lenient and they circulated a petition for referendum to challenge the ordinance.

Ms. Beck said the election board determined 138 of the total 163 signatures on the petition were valid, which is greater than the 8 percent of active voters in the township during the last governor’s race.

The property owners had challenged the petition alleging that Trustee Tim Tillman, who received the petition from the residents, did not follow the law in submitting them to the election board.

They alleged that he was not authorized to submit the petition to the election board on the township’s behalf and that he did not file it within the 14 days specified by law.

Mr. Tillman, however, testified he was acting on advice from Logan County Prosecutor Gerald Heaton when he did not take the petition to the board of trustees for a vote. He admitted he did not file a copy with the township’s financial officer.

That, according to Mr. Miller, cast a shadow over the petition’s legitimacy.

“What the petitioners did totally subverted the process that is laid out by legislative authority,” he said. “The entire process was shrouded in secrecy.”

But Daniel Brown, who represented 28 petitioners, said errors by officials should not negate a petition for referendum that was properly submitted by residents.

“If there are any deficiencies, it was on the part of elected officials and not the people who prepared the petition,” he said. “Every time a board of trustees doesn’t like a petition of referendum or action of citizens, all they have to do is sit on it for two weeks and it goes away.”

Ms. Beck, who was joined by board member Ben Stahler in issuing the ruling, said they tended to believe Mr. Tillman answered questions truthfully and that the discussion of the trustees at the first meeting after the petitions were filed was adequate to meet the requirements of state law.

Election board members Nancy Knight and Bill Montgomery did not take part in the discussion and vote to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Mrs. Knight has a relative involved in the issue, while Mr. Montgomery has done legal work in the case.

By Reuben Mees
Staff Writer

The Bellefontaine Examiner

5 January 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon