[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

'Wind farm planners made series of errors'  

A damning report into the handling of a planning application to build Lincolnshire’s biggest wind farm said council officers committed a catalogue of errors.

It said planners at East Lindsey District Council made mistakes in dealing with the 20-turbine wind farm at Conisholme, near Louth.

As reported, it was first refused in 2004 due to the visual impact of the turbines on the Louth Marsh landscape.

But, Ecotricity’s second application for even bigger turbines was approved by East Lindsey District planners in October 2005.

A report from lawyers commissioned by East Lindsey District Council said councillors were “not best served by relevant officers”.

Lawyers from Pinsent Masons said officers failed to provide all details to planning councillors on the second application by Ecotricity.

They said: “It is wrong that the second application was not subject to some kind of independent landscape and visual assessment.

“In our view members, when determining the second application, should have had before them material specifically dealing with these aspects in relation to that application.”

They added: “The performance of officers seemed to us to fall short of what we believe members could reasonably expect of them.”

Lawyers said officers “inappropriately” concluded the benefits of the turbines outweighed any harm to the landscape.

They also criticised the lack of minutes taken from crucial meetings about the application.

The role of ELDC chief executive Nigel Howells came under the spotlight as he stepped in at the October planning meeting to provide “senior officer presence” because there was no monitoring officer or legal adviser.

That was despite him being “closely involved” through correspondence with both Ecotricity and the objectors.

The lawyers said it was up to Mr Howells to declare an interest, which he did not do.

They also said it was “surprising” no monitoring officer or legal adviser attended the meeting given the controversy surrounding the application.

Grimsby Telegraph

4 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter