| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
'Serious mistakes could have affected result'
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Objectors to the wind farm said they will be seeking legal advice on the findings of the report.
Campaigner Jill Lingard said: “There were serious errors that could have affected the result. What they do in the future is not going to change what happened. It was a multi-million pound development and they made errors. Whatever they do is not going to help the people in this area.”
She added: “It is a serious matter. The report is critical of the professionalism of the officers. They made the errors. We are not happy with the review report because it is East Lindsey’s report into the actions by East Lindsey officers.”
The first of the 20 turbines have been erected by Ecotricity.
Five turbines each 89-metres high dominate the landscape. The firm said they are due to start operating in March.
4 December 2007
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=9046 ]
